Poignant McMahon Should Silence 26 Year Old Cheers

Charles Martin was suspended for two games for his body-slam that resulted in a season-ending concussion for Jim McMahon. The Bountygate players are suspended for zero games. Even as Saints fans celebrate, we all should know better today.

2012 may have been unlike any other year, especially regarding the swift hand of justice coming down on misbehavior in football in America.   A quick look at Penn State’s unprecedented leveling of its once-revered football program sets the bar for years to come.  Intolerable behavior in real-life will not be excused, simply because the men involved are considered above-the-law by its fans.

However, the recent appellate reversal of the player suspensions related to the New Orleans Saints’ “Bountygate” scandal  is worth a double take.  As Will Smith and Jonathon Vilma were suddenly cleared to play on opening weekend, you realize that, in essence, they've really lost nothing.  Oh, they may lose some money, as Roger Goodell may have the ability to assess some financial penalties, but he apparently doesn't have the authority to punish the players for an underground hit-squad-for-pay system.

Meanwhile, Sean Payton and the rest of the Saints organization may want to consider joining a union, as all of the punishments handed down to them for encouraging (or not stopping) the bounty program are all still intact.  While Smith will be lining up on the field today, the repercussions of his actions will be felt by the franchise and their fans for several years.

But the cry from Saints fans brought back memories of the fans who defended the repeated and egregious actions of Indiana’s Bobby Knight, who could count on a legion of alumni and dedicated fans to rise up to dismiss whatever he had done.

And if you don’t believe me, just ask Mike Patton, a Yahoo! Sports Contributor who didn't waste a moment to celebrate the ability for his Saints players to be reinstated on a technicality, even though the guilt of their actions still stand in the form of the sanctions against the team itself.

As a Saints fan, I am happy to see justice prevail here, at least for now. This was the right decision for a number of reasons. It will be good to see the defense at full strength soon, and hopefully this controversy can soon be a thing of the past.   http://sports.yahoo.com/news/orleans-saints-suspended-players-cleared-play-opening-game-114000658--nfl.html

Why is all of this going through my head on this beautiful Sunday morning, when the Packers are suiting up to play their season opener?  If you didn’t grab a copy of this week’s Sports Illustrated (September 10, 2012), I highly recommend that you do exactly that, and read the story by Melissa Segura on the women caring for retired NFL players suffering early-onset dementia from the very kinds of hits that the Bountygate players were paying each other to make.

It was the story of the former Packer that affected me the most.  Perhaps you might be thinking of the man on the cover of the issue, quarterback Jim McMahon, who served as Brett Favre’s backup in 1996, bringing home a Super Bowl ring for holding a clipboard and mentoring a young Favre after his own prime had long past.  But you would be incorrect.

Let's be honest.  Most of us never liked McMahon.  Most of us tolerated his presence on the Packers roster because he shut up and didn’t try and overshadow the team.  And, after the Super Bowl, when he whined about not getting to play, we nodded our heads and said, “Yep…same old McMahon.”

But this is a far different Jim McMahon.  Segura does a masterful job taking the familiar face with the winged sunglasses and telling the story of the blank stare that likely hides behind.   Only 53, McMahon depends on his girlfriend to keep a daily journal for him, leave signal notes for him, and help him navigate what has become an increasingly smaller world since his diagnosis with dementia.

When you read the story of a man waking in a hotel room, calling for his dog to help him navigate to his bathroom, only to be told that he’s not even at home, it turns the Punky Arch-Enemy instantly into a sympathetic figure for any Packer fan.  No one wants to see Walter Payton or Mike Singletary crippled and alone in life, frightened by every shadow and invisible stalker coming to take the last of their dignity.  Yet this is now the story of McMahon.

Slipped into the article, however, was one quick mention of the Green and Gold, a reminder of one reason why he  is where he is today.

…McMahon was suffering from early-onset dementia, a condition the couple connects to his four documented concussions that McMahon suffered during his 15-year career, including a 1986 season-ending body slam by Green Bay’s Charles Martin.  That year a Chicago Sun-Times story had predicted facetiously that McMahon would one day wear the phrase BRAIN-DAMAGED on his famous headbands.  His diagnosis turned that joke into a grim reality.  [Sports Illustrated, 9/10/12, “The Other Half of the Story”, by Melissa Segura]

McMahon is never going to get better.  Someday, he is going to look at his two Super Bowl rings and not remember what they are or why he has them.  Someone will need to explain what the “Super Bowl Shuffle” is to him, or worse, who the guy with the sunglasses is in the video.

But here’s the rub.  CD Angeli in 1986 was a typical 18 year-old, a freshman in college.  He watched endless amounts of professional wrestling, pointlessly punctuated his sentences with excessive profanity, and cruised for chicks.  And he watched every Packer game in a frustrating season spent in the shadow of the Bears’ Super Bowl years.

And, he watched that game where Martin body-slammed McMahon, well after the ball was gone.  It wasn’t a late hit.  It wasn’t unintentional.  It was meant to hurt him, and it did.  He reinjured an already hurt shoulder, and suffered a concussion.  In those days, we worried more about the shoulder than the concussion.

And, that 18 year-old kid watched Charles Martin walk off the field and high-five Mossy Cade (another great role model).  He watched Martin strut around with a shit-eating grin on the sideline, ejected, while the starting quarterback for the other team sat in the locker room, wondering where he was.

And that 18 year-old kid cheered.

He pumped his fist and he celebrated the knockout.  He knew it was wrong.  He knew it was cheating.  But the ends justified the means, and any victory against the Bears was worth the price.  He was a stupid teenager who still believed wrestling was real, that men could be knocked out on the mat, then somehow resummon their strength (despite being a chokehold) and come back to win the match.

Charles Martin Illegal Hit

And, after all, Martin was a Packer.  You stand by your team and its players, no matter what.  Right?

The kid has grown up now.   I visit my 93 year-old grandfather, who sits in a nursing home, suffering from Parkinson’s disease.  I've seen a once-proud man that I once idolized and respected now dependent on others for everything from feeding to clothing to toileting.  Dementia isn’t a joke.  Concussions, like the two my daughter suffered during last year’s basketball season, aren’t anything you shake off or just recover from.

Charles Martin isn’t a hero.   He passed away several years ago, but the impact of his actions live on in a ghost who is losing more and more of his identity every day.

McMahon is a part of a collective lawsuit against the NFL that hopes to charge that the league somehow knew more about concussions than they told players, that they intentionally put them back into ballgames knowing that they were putting players at greater and greater risk.

Football is inherently a violent game with tremendous risks.  Players dress in near-full suits of armor, hidden by colorful Nike uniforms, and are stronger and faster than they’ve ever been.  A legal hit is always a threat of being a career-ender for the greatest and least among the players in the league.   I’m not putting a lot of stock in the players’ suit coming out with a tremendous victory, simply because I don’t know if anyone understood the impact of concussions in 1986 like we do today.  Just like Aaron Rodgers, any player is jumping to get back in the game as soon as possible following a concussion, even in an era where we do know the long-term perils involved.

But the very idea of intentionally concussing another player, knowing what we know today, is unfathomable.  Perhaps Kenny Stills and Martin did have their own “hit list” in those days.  It doesn’t make it any less reprehensible, especially seeing the impact on one player who was crossed off the list on Martin’s towel.

Finding out that a year ago today--the season opener of the 2011 season--Aaron Rodgers was a target in the purported bounty scheme should enrage Packer fans.  After all, he had suffered two concussions and missed a start in the previous season.

Rodgers only needs one more concussion to equal McMahon’s career total.

Allowing the Bountygate players to get away with their actions without missing a game is a crime against all the players struggling to live out their lives with dementia.  Even Charles Martin was suspended for two games for his actions.

I take back my celebrations all those years ago, and apologize to McMahon for doing so.  I was a dumb kid who didn’t know any better.  But today, Saints fans should know better.  Because we all know better.

-----------------

C.D. Angeli is a Feature Writer for Cheesehead TV and a co-host of the weekly live Packer talk show Cheesehead Radio.  Contact him at [email protected]

 

0 points
 

Comments (11)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
JohnRehor's picture

September 09, 2012 at 08:26 am

It's funny how time changes perspective on things.

When the bodyslam happened, I also reveled in it. How a Packer had overpowered the Bears by whatever means was necessary. It was wrong, I knew it was wrong, and I really didn't care. Not even after a seemingly never ending amount of shit from my friends did I care.

As I look back on that act years later, I see an act which defies sportsmanship, defines stupidity, and raised the eyebrows of opposing fans everywhere. The Packers, well at least this one Packer for this one moment, sucked. It is a painful reminder of how bad things once were with this franchise.

Will we ever know if this one play was the one which started McMahon down the path of dementia? No. But if it had never happened, could it have helped his current situation? Maybe.

I'm a little older, and I like to think a little wiser than I was in 1986. What was to be celebrated in '86 I look back at in disgust in 2012. Charles Martin knew better, he just didn't care. I hope the rest of the NFL learned a little from the Saints episode this past summer, and players care about their long term health by not participating in bounty programs.

A violent sport doesn't need any more inspiration to be any more violent.

0 points
0
0
GreenBaySavant's picture

September 09, 2012 at 08:39 am

Very sobering and thought provoking. On the "four letter" website, I've been arguing with fans ever since bounty gate broke about the seriousness of deliberately hurting other players. From those interactions, it seems many people (not just Saints fans), think there is nothing wrong with what they did and don't like the newer rules that attempt to protect players. Whenever I post a link to the lawsuit web page and ask what they think about it and the possibility of the NFL changing drastically as a result (http://nflheadinjurylawsuits.com/), I never seem to get a response.
I love football. It's my favorite sport. I bleed green and gold. I know that for the long term success of this sport, some things need to change. This can be done voluntarily like the NFL is trying to do now. Or, it could be more drastically affected as the court of public opinion becomes less favorable for what they will try to label as an "extreme fringe sport" like boxing and MMA. Which will eventually lead to less revenue and less popularity.
Football has already become less popular as a youth sport. Participation is at an all time low.

0 points
0
0
Cuphound's picture

September 09, 2012 at 08:58 am

An excellent and sobering piece.

0 points
0
0
Mark's picture

September 09, 2012 at 09:13 am

Outstanding read.

0 points
0
0
Colleen's picture

September 09, 2012 at 10:16 am

I didn't cheer, but I understand exactly why you did. Well written and very true, CD.

0 points
0
0
Packerken's picture

September 09, 2012 at 11:04 am

Great piece about McMahon and the struggles with post concussion syndrome.

My only quarrel is with people calling what the Saints had a "pay to injure" system. We have seen no proof. The Hargrove's "ädmission" said nothing of trying to injure anyone. I want to see some of the actual evidence proving this before I place my faith in what Goddell says. After all, no one was fined when any of these hits happened. Why not? Greg Williams' speech was disgusting but that's on Williams, not the players.

0 points
0
0
MLecl0001's picture

September 09, 2012 at 12:05 pm

Great article CD, however I have to agree with Packerken. Show me the proof. In todays day it is getting really sad we are in a guilty until proven innocent setting. I thought this country was built on certain ideals, such as due process. Now I understand that the NFL is a private entity however we as a country have progressively gotten worse, especially with instant media, with regards to due process.

It is no longer an innocent until proven guilty country, it is now guilty and if proven innocent so what country. Remember the Duke Lacrosse players? It is so easy to forget the mistakes and to push them to page 20. Yet for those young boys whose lives were dismantled it wont be easy to forget.

While its easy to say that the Saints had a bounty program, and I do dislike the Saints as a team and organization I will say what I say to any one being accused of anything, prove it. All I have seen so far is some very aggressive speech from a coach, and some smack talk from some dude that was linked to the team. Some of the same remarks I have heard time and time again by your average fans, the only difference being is the fans have no official ties to a team.

But then I guess its ok to just say every one is guilty no matter what, you can always just bury an apology on page 20 somewhere.

0 points
0
0
tundravision's picture

September 09, 2012 at 08:23 pm

Well, the good news is I promise I will not bury an apology deep in the comments.

The bad news is I'm not going to apologize.

I said nothing of admissions or evidence. I said, clearly twice in the article, that the sanctions that were lifted from the players still loom in the shadow of the sanctions that have taken place against the coaches and the franchise.

The appeals court never stated that there was no evidence to support the suspensions. They said that Roger Goodell did not have the authority to suspend the players in this type of situation. It's like how the jurisdiction of the sheriff in one county doesn't carry over to the next, and can't arrest you for a crime you committed there. It doesn't mean that no crime was committed.

If Payton is reinstated and the Saints get their draft picks back, Ill start thinking about taking some of my words back. But a union lawyer looked at the CBA and found a loophole that got his clients off...the franchise isn't so fortunate.

0 points
0
0
Ruppert's picture

September 11, 2012 at 10:49 am

CD, nice piece. I am about your age and cheered that hit, too. And I went ahead and DVR'd the '85 Bears game in Lambeau last year just so I could watch Ken Stills light up Matt Suhey a dozen more times. And I offer no apologies.

Regarding the Saints, I'm kinda tired of all this "show me the proof" stuff.

Here's the proof: Gregg Williams, who is a known jerk, came clean and outlined the entire thing. When the guy who invented and administered the entire program comes out and does that, it's proof enough for me.

Better yet, how could anybody conclusively prove that any given hit on any given football field is intentionally done to injure? It can't be done. So Williams coming out and laying it all on the line is proof enough for me. Guilty. They got lucky.

0 points
0
0
Tommyboy's picture

September 09, 2012 at 03:07 pm

Very well done. This makes a similar point I made in an extended post on another site a while back. In general, people pick the team they pull for based on geography. Also, I think that in general people tend to respect the spirit of sports and that it is actually a good thing that there are fans of every franchise (except , of course, for the Vikings). The problem, of course, are the fools who don't understand that and blindly defend anything their team does and disrespects anyone who isn't them. You see, I presume that besides geography, you have also found something valuable that goes beyond the field as to why you want your respective team to win....ya know, it is, in theory, why we support sports - the intangible assets it augments. Otherwise, sports really is just a significant waste of time and money. So, when your team, yes even your team, does something morally irreprehensible, you shouldn't cheer when you discover that the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

Boy, trying to abbreviate my thought turned into a pretty poor articulation of what I want to say, but I hope the basic idea of what I am getting at is conveyed. If not, just understand that I am saying "Go Pack", with the exception of Charlie Martin.

0 points
0
0
Paul Dier's picture

September 09, 2012 at 09:07 pm

Looking back to those times now, I am not a proud fan of the Packers in the mid 80's. Thank the lord, we hired Ron Wolf and brought this team back to respectability. A very well-written piece

0 points
0
0