54 Responses to “Much More To Come…”

Subscribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL

Well put, DDD. If Aaron Rodgers wants this to be HIS team, HE needs to play better and lead this team to a “signature” win. If HE plays better, and wins some big games, then he will have the clout to get in the face of some of some of his teammates. Until then, he’s just another one of the underachievers.

KCNYC said in November 9th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

Cutler hasn’t proven anything and he gets in his teammates faces all the time.
.
I get the same feeling. Seems like he looks at his stats and says…I’m doing my job. Everybody else has to step up. Not the approach you take to be a GREAT player, no matter how good you are.

NickGBP said in November 9th, 2009 at 10:19 pm

There has been a change in Rodgers over the past two games. I couldn’t put my finger on it. So late this afternoon I decided to go back and watch his play management. Something came out of that little exercise that I hadn’t seen in earlier games. He is not calling many audibles. When he’s in the gun he is not directing players or changing the assignment calls. And rarely when under center is he doing anything but carrying out the called play. I have to believe this is by design.
____
In both the Queen and Buc game the enemy rushed 4 about 70% of the time and rarely 5. The Packers were keeping 7 in to block almost always. So, with GB putting 3 receivers out and the enemy with 7 defenders the O to D ratio was 2+:1 almost always. Could be coverage is having something to do with AR’s slow reaction.
_____
Add this to the patterns above. MM in a presser said: “Our plan was to attack the secondary, they beat us. If we played again today, I’d do the same thing again.”
____
The combination of events above tells me this. MM had Jennings and Driver going deep all the time and the third receiver was the checkdown and was covered most of the time.
_____
And worst of all he would do it again. I wish I had more elevation to be able to see the full field of play to confirm my guess but it was the best I could do with the TV shots.

Ron La Canne said in November 9th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

“And don’t start with the whole “Rodgers and Jennings aren’t the problem” crap.”

Amen. I am Jennings’ biggest supporter; but I am also objective. And he flat out hasn’t been getting it done.

IronMan said in November 9th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

“Add this to the patterns above. MM in a presser said: “Our plan was to attack the secondary, they beat us. If we played again today, I’d do the same thing again.”

Of course he would do the same thing again. And we would lose again. That’s why they suck. Just like he tells his team to cut back on penalties after every game. That’s why EVERYONE is questioning his coaching ability and play calling.

fish said in November 9th, 2009 at 11:56 pm

We would do the same thing again, but we would win IF we didn’t keep giving the Bucs the ball in the red zone.
The Bucs only had one long drive in that game.
There was also that blocked punt for a TD.

nerdmann said in November 10th, 2009 at 12:25 am

I gotta give it to you. You are usually on both of their nuts. But to call them out is big of you; you are rather objective…… a little too objective often times.

dennis eckersley said in November 10th, 2009 at 1:23 am

cannot hate on rodgers man, the kid isnt a fault…not fully neways…

alfredomartinez said in November 10th, 2009 at 2:50 am

I’m a supporter of Rodgers, but you cannot say he played well on Sunday. He played like crap.

Normally a good QB playing a crappy game can be written off as a one-off; that shit happens from time to time. But I’m not seeing it this way. H’e actually started to regress as a QB.

He looks to be learning some bad habits that the coaching staff is either unable or unwilling to correct. Amazingly enough, after all the criticism from the past few weeks about him holding the ball too long, he is holding it even longer. Against the worst team in the league.

At the end of the day, while I think Rodgers deserves his share of the blame for the Packers’ performance Sunday and the previous 8 weeks, I still have to focus on the coaching staff. Their job is to put the players on the field in the best position to win games. And they have not done that. Moreover, they have destroyed whatever measure of confidence that the team had coming out of training camp, and lasting through the Bears’ game. After week one, this team had a swagger that is completely gone. Some might be ok with that, but I think to win consistently in this league, you have to play with a certain attitude that you expect to make plays, that you expect to wear the other team down, and that you expect to win. Now they simply hope to win.

I don’t see it turning around this season. Why? I look back to last season. After the Packers beat the Colts, they were 4-3 and had just beaten one of the best teams in the league. I think they justifiably had a bit of a swagger then. But then they found ways to lose winnable games against the Titans and the Vikings (both good teams last season), and the confidence was gone. It’s happening again this year. As Bedard tweeted, this game should have been wrapped up by halftime. And they would have won this game by three touchdowns if they never threw the ball once after going up 21-14. Instead, the coaching staff called the only possible game they could have lost, calling for 40+ dropbacks in gusty winds against a defense we were gashing for 5+ yards a carry. But instead of constantly handing of to Ryan Grant and Ahman Green, the coaches put Rodgers back to pass behind a line that hasn’t blocked anyone all season. For no goddamn reason.

So yes, blame Aaron Rodgers for his crappy game, and note that Rodgers is not progressing like you would like a QB to progress at this point in the season. But note also why he’s getting worse. He’s playing for a coach who simply doesn’t know how to win football games and develop the talent on the club.

bucky said in November 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

DDD, those two are exhibiting the same kind of BS false confidence and entitlement that their fat coach regularly spouts off with. McCarthy thinks they’re better than they are, and it’s filtering right down through the players. You’re absolutely right….AR and GJ are doing exactly what you said. But they ARE following the lead of their coach. I think this issue with those players CAN be corrected by a better coach. Would these guys be acting this way if Parcells/Holmgren/Cowher was coach? No way. McCarthy’s problems, evidently, cannot be corrected, since he’s been doing the same thing for 4 years.

Ruppert said in November 10th, 2009 at 8:31 am

I’m starting to think Judas had more self-discipline than I thought if MM couldn’t ruin him. Oh wait, I got overweening ego confused with self-discipline. At any rate, maybe the best thing these guys can do for now is coach each other and themselves. At least they know (I really do think) that they are sucking right now.

foundinidaho said in November 10th, 2009 at 9:18 am

Rodgers and Jennings have had some problems this year, but on the list of things that have gone wrong. They are way at the bottom. These would be minor problems if the o-line could block for more than half a second. If the defense could put pressure on the QB. If the special teams could tackle a returner before they got to the 50.

Those are the major concerns. A QB on pace to put up 4000 yards and 30 to 10 td:int ratio is not. His holding the ball to long is minor problem that is looking alot worse because of an awful o-line. Worst i’ve ever seen.

RockinRodgers said in November 10th, 2009 at 9:27 am

Speaking of extensions, MM & TT haven’t exactly burned up the league since they got theirs.

Mr. Optimistic said in November 10th, 2009 at 9:38 am

Rodgers doesn’t get a free pass. The NFL is a harsh world. QB gets more grief for an average record than any other player, and it takes a roster. I agree that Rodgers isn’t near elite at this point and is only ‘good.’

Just a side-bar: all the amature analysis without the coaches tape and only You-tube is utter shit. Stop making grand pronouncements that you ‘get a feeling’ about what’s in a guys head or know if he even has checkdowns available. We all sound like brilliant coaches in retrospect with access to You Tube.

I agree that this is a mediocre team at the moment and looks ill-prepared. Also, I agree Rodgers is looking only above average right now. But nothing pisses me off more than fans on an underachieving team that suddenly ‘know what’s in a players head’, or act like they’ve seen a 360 degree view of the game from the coaches tape. Pretty damn arrogant….. So go ahead, overreact to this as well. You must know what’s in my head too.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 10:11 am

This time I just cannot contradict you Aaron. Fact is, for a team to be better than the other, the playmakers need to play big, not just solid. And they haven’t even be solid…

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 10:14 am

@RockinRodgers-

Rodgers is equally to blame by not simply dumping the ball. There’s no reason anyone should take a coverage sack, yet he’s taken several in consecutive weeks.

I’d rather he take a sack than throw a pick, but I’d rather he throw it away than take a sack if possible. He hasn’t done a good job of that this season.

SpartaChris said in November 10th, 2009 at 10:24 am

Whilst I agree that its a team problem, I wouldn’t tar DD with the same brush as everyone else. If only he could throw to himself.

AdamInEngland said in November 10th, 2009 at 10:37 am

The only defense I can offer for Rodgers is this is his second season as a starter.

In his second season as a starter, Favre was making mistakes and frustrating us too. But I do think Favre had a better offensive line then than Rodgers does now.

Remember how Peyton Manning gets happy feet if he doesn’t feel secure. He spent quite a few years getting creamed before the Colts were able to adequately protect him.

I’ve lost confidence in McCarthy and Thompson, not Rodgers.

PiedmontPackerFan said in November 10th, 2009 at 10:49 am

Again, Rodgers needs to step up. Unless I’m mistaken, when he has gone to ‘checkdown’ his running backs don’t seem to catch the ball. I think we’re on 24 drops in 32 quarters. Still don’t know how James Jones gets the ‘good’ category when it was Rodgers that placed a pass on the button and Jones only had to run straigt ahead to score 74 yds. When the team needed clutch from Jones on the first play of the final series he started by, stay with me folks, dropping the ball on a substantial gain. Then Rodgers scrammbled for a long 1st down run and conversion only to, stay with me folks, get it called back because of holding. Rodgers 2nd interception should have never been thrown into that coverage to Jennings, but it did bounce off his chest/shoulderpad. Elite receivers catch that ball, don’t they?

Again, Rodgers doesn’t get a free pass, but how many drops are ok? How often can a QB be in obnoxious down-and-distance and expected to convert? Just so I understand, we’re not asking Rodgers to play good or even great, we EXPECT him to be superb on a weekly basis to compensate for poor play elsewhere? Sounds more then fair. Why isn’t he elite every snap (sarcasm)?

Not giving a free pass, just laughing a bit at the intensity and direction of the pitchfork/torch crowd.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:04 am

Coaches tape or not, I get the feeling that the O line is brutal, and I get the feeling that McCarthy should be wearing gigantic shoes, face paint, and a big red rubber ball for a nose.

Ruppert said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:05 am

Ruppert, you’re stating the obvious based on weekly performance and lack of preparation. But it’s utterly idiotic, bitter and without merit to state,

“I like Aaron Rodgers, but I am getting the feeling that he thinks he is far better than he actually is.”

Be critical of his game, that’s more than fair, but making a statement like this is pure unadulturated shit.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:13 am
CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:13 am

Of course I don’t have all the data to make a complete analysis. I didn’t realize that wasn’t allowed. I’ll try to do better.

Ron La Canne said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:17 am

Anyone can analyze and report, Ron. I don’t think anyone can dispute the lack of preparation for this team. By all means, pile on and I won’t/can’t dispute it. No matter how you cut it players aren’t executing, preparing or playing for the coach/coaching staff. On the other hand, question the game plans and game management starting with McCarthy on down. I have no objection.

I do object to people matter of factly stating what they THINK other players ego’s THINK of themselves. Without merit and a very embittered statement. Knock his judegment, knock his timing, knock his inability to execute against the Buc’s. It’s sour grapes silly to state or imply it must be Rodgers ego getting in the way, he simply thinks he’s better than he is.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:24 am

I get your point, CSS. But I don’t think it’s totally out of the realm of possibility to make a statement about overconfidence based on a couple things that you DON’T need game tape to back up. I’m talking about McCarthy–specifically the protection scheme and to a lesser extent the playcalling. There is no reason this team, with the “quality” of it’s O line, should not have extra bodies to pass block EVERY SINGLE DROPBACK. Due to the obvious lack of talent of this line, we should be throwing about 1 deep ball every half, and throwing 15 passes to that running back (who chips the DE) a game. But no…McCarthy won’t even consider it. I think that is basis enough to back up the assertion of overconfidence on his part. And it’s pretty clear to me that Rodgers is following orders, hence making him just as culpable. This O needs to play within the confines of what it is capable of doing.

Ruppert said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:28 am

Ruppert, I agree with every word you said. The key is the play calling itself. I’ve only seen a guy available on check down a minority of the plays. The running back is more often then not in pure pass pro and not chipping. Also, there appear to be far to many two man routes and no designed roll outs with one of the more athletic QB’s in the league. Why keep him in a pocket that isn’t capable of moving unless Rodgers makes a great individual play (which he did on his TD run and 1st down run that was called back).

I agree with what you’re saying 100%. I just completely disagree with somebody saying it’s pure ego or hubris on Rodgers behalf. Would he prepare all off season at the level he did if it were pure ego? He shoulders the blame and doesn’t throw his line under the bus or reference shit penalties and drops during press conferences, is that egomanical?

Ruppert, well put. Let’s see adjustments in game plan NOW and discipline. Something I’ve not witnessed in the McCarthy tenure.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:34 am

Good discussion above…

More effort should have been prepared getting a team setup that could support a new inexperienced QB. I don’t believe the team was ready for the change.

Everybody wanted the decision to replace AR with Favre to work so bad that the expectations for Rodgers were unrealistic. He is not Favre… maybe in the future but not now. Reasonable folks knew what lay ahead.., yada, yada – old story.

I believe Rodgers holds the ball to long but perhaps with experience that will get better. And he will not last in the NFL running the ball even though he has some talent at it or playing crouching tiger behind a weak OL. Throw it away or give a top receiver a chance to make a play (forget the stats- they only protect TT and MM). But he cannot make an excuse about the cards he was dealt. That’s just the way it is.

Overall, I still believe TT is the primary cause of the current situation and MM is on his coat tail.

greenbaypackerbob said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:40 am

CSS: That shit is absolutely adulterated.

It’s my feeling, at it was pretty clearly stated as such. I don’t see a lot of improvement in things that quite obviously need to improve. I hear Rodgers talk to the press about how he DOESN’T need to change the way he plays. That troubles me. But you are right, I absolutely cannot prove anything about what is going on in Rodger’s head. Of course, I never set out to “prove” what is going on in Rodgers’s head. I only say that—based upon my observations—he acts like a guy that believes he has nothing left to prove.
—-
And it’s not just Rogders. I observe what seems to be complacency all the way down the roster. I want to see a team that is hungry, that has something to prove and wants to go out and prove it. What I actually see is a team that acts as if they have nothing left to prove.

D.D. Driver said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:40 am

CSS, the point of my humble analysis was to point out that other things are happening that cannot be written off to slow release, poor check down, etc. Other things are also involved and they have as much impact on AR’s play as his personal skills. Maybe I shold have made that clearer.

Ron La Canne said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:42 am

“I FEEL that 30% of the posters here enjoy watching hobos molest dead cats. I have nothing substantial to show as much, I’m just pissed and believe it so.”

Let’s agree the statement is purely subjective and I disagree.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:47 am

“Good discussion above…

More effort should have been prepared getting a team setup that could support a new inexperienced QB. I don’t believe the team was ready for the change.

Everybody wanted the decision to replace AR with Favre to work so bad that the expectations for Rodgers were unrealistic. He is not Favre… maybe in the future but not now. Reasonable folks knew what lay ahead.., yada, yada – old story.

I believe Rodgers holds the ball to long but perhaps with experience that will get better. And he will not last in the NFL running the ball even though he has some talent at it or playing crouching tiger behind a weak OL. Throw it away or give a top receiver a chance to make a play (forget the stats- they only protect TT and MM). But he cannot make an excuse about the cards he was dealt. That’s just the way it is.

Overall, I still believe TT is the primary cause of the current situation and MM is on his coat tail.”

Agree 100% with what you said. I mean, when you can skip the broken record, you actually make a very sound argument!

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:48 am

Ron, I completely agree.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:49 am

And DDD, I think what CSS ois trying to say (not that he needs me to translate or something) is that it’s one thing to call a player complacent. It’s another thing to say he’s ego is too inflated, which is what I understanded you implied…

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:50 am

PackersRS you are correct. I dissect Rodgers game as much as anybody and offer no excuses. I don’t see scheme, players or packages prepared for games and it starts at the top.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:53 am

The NFP article you posted… I agree with it to some extent… But he says that the players aren’t buying into the program… That part I have to disagree with… I think it’s more that the program itself doesn’t fit the players we have… We just don’t have a decent enough OL and a good enough running game to sustain a deep passing attack all the time. We don’t have enough pass rush to just send 4 most of the time, being those the same 4…

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

Attention all K-Mart shoppers – we’re on a blog. It happens to be an exceptional blog as blogs go, but passionate opinions tend to outpace well thought out analysis. Just the reality of the medium. I’ll duck from the incoming now…

Andrew In Atlanta said in November 10th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

It’s funny how “fans” somehow feel qualified to demonize a team & specific players on that team while viewing games on their 25″ RCAs from their ratty couches as the MT beer cans pile-up on the floor……. Then to make matters even worse, these same “fans” go to all the “illustrious” blogs & media rags to find out how they should think ……. You ‘fans’ have it all figured out………… I doubt it.

WoodyG said in November 10th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

I absolutely think Rodgers is cocky and has a bit of a swagger. While I like those traits to some extent, I wish that at this stage of his career he had more of a chip on his shoulder. He isn’t improving and he has made it quite clear that he doesn’t THINK he has to improve. And this isn’t just speculation on my part. These are essentially his own words.

And if you observe with your eyes 30% of posters here that seem to your observation to enjoy watching hobo’s molest dead cats. And you hear with your own ears 30% of posters here suggest that they actually don’t mind watching hobos molest dead cats. Well, the it’s not unreasonable for you to draw some tentative conclusions.

But whatever. Unless, Rodgers signs an affidavit that he thinks he is better than he actually is, I guess we have no basis to wonder.

D.D. Driver said in November 10th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

For the record, I also believe that Favre is a jerk. I don’t need a signed affidavit from Favre admitting that he is a jerk. I have drawn that conclusion based upon his own conduct and words.

It is within the relm of possibility that Favre is the most humble and nicest guy in the world and he just *acts* like a jerk.

So is it unreasonable for me to believe that he is a jerk based upon his words and conduct?

If not, then why is it unreasonable for me to draw conclusions about Rodgers based upon HIS words and conduct?

D.D. Driver said in November 10th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

” If not, then why is it unreasonable for me to draw conclusions about Rodgers based upon HIS words and conduct? ”
___________________
Sit down with AR or any player, have a cup of coffee & discuss the state of the Packers for even 30 minutes, then you have REAL information on which to base your opinions……. Now you have nothing except what your ‘illustrious’ providers of info deem neccessary at this point….. “Big Brother” has you right where he wants you……. under his thumb.

WoodyG said in November 10th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

Woody – bullshit. When players are with the media, that is their chance to convey whatever it is they want to convey for mass consumption. It’s not on the fan to ‘have a cup of coffee’ with the player (which is just an asinine argument, btw). If players don’t want to take advantage of the platforms they are given, that’s on them – not the fans.

Aaron Nagler said in November 10th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

It’s on the fan for drawing conclusions based on scant information…… But I’m sure you agree with DDD…. You’re the one who provided the platform for him…. You’re kinda like his “Big Brother”…… As long as his views & your views are the same…… Then I’m sure you’ll defend his every word.

WoodyG said in November 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

First of all, what’s up with the attack?? Play on words, sarcasm…
-
So, DDD, the reason you feel Rodgers is egocentric, as opposed to complacent, is because???? What are those words and actions that clearly proves he’s egocentric?
-
But you want to be sarcastic… I’ll be frank. Comparing Rodgers, who stood while fans booed him his first game as a starter, who stayed 3 years as a backup, who endured the flipflops of Favre, with that same Favre, who retired and unretired so he could skip offseason, who flipped the bird to his fans and went to the biggest rival (one of), is ludicrous, to not say ill intentioned.
-
Take a pause before concluding that Rodgers is full of himself because he said he should play the same way. Because last time I checked, this was not your homepage: http://www.tmz.com/ How’s that for a far-fetched comparison???

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

“Ego-centric” and and “full of himself” are your words not mine. Keep your words and all of your other possessions out of my mouth.
—-
What I actually said was that it seems to me that he thinks he is better than he is. You can have an inflated self-opinion and not be an egomaniac.
—-
And I’m hardly “comparing” Rodgers to Favre. Again, your words, my mouth.
—-
Is my opinion based upon my own obervations? Yes. Do I have a ton of information to base my opinion? No. And that’s why I said that “I’m getting the feeling that…” For crying out loud, can I soft sell it any more? How much bigger of a disclaimer do I need so that people don’t get their panties in a tangle?

D.D. Driver said in November 10th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Woody – clearly, you are not familiar with my past battles with DDD. Needless to say, I “provide a platform for him” (which I don’t – Blogger does) because his observations are always intelligent and astute, weather I agree with them or not.

Aaron Nagler said in November 10th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

Aaron

I’m not referring to the past….. Only this blog is relevant to any comments I have made as are yours………. As you would say… ” A. Fucking. Men. ”
_______________
Obviously you’re in total agreement with DDD……… What once were character enhancements for AR have now become character flaws ……… Why?… Because the Pack have lost two & put a successful season in jeopardy…… I would never contend that AR’s character has altered in the last two weeks …. How can anyone so far removed from a situation (like a fan) draw any conclusions?……… It’s folly & an emotional response that deserves very little attention …… To devote an entire blog on this subject matter is far from being even-keeled when discussing the NFL ……. However, what I do enjoy is how some vocal PackFans have set themselves up for a big fall if……..

WoodyG said in November 10th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

Interesting analysis by the Press Gazette:

“— The Bucs’ press coverage all but took away the quick-hitters and three-step drops after Rodgers hit WR Greg Jennings for option slants of 11 and 6 on the first two drives. It also made receivers work harder to get open at times, and with the mounting protection issues up front, downfield routes sometimes didn’t clear fast enough for Rodgers to get the ball out. At other times, the Cover-2 shell created a bracket effect, such as on the second interception — a post that went through Jennings’ hands at the 4. Bucs CB Aqib Talib, matched up with Jennings much of the day, was playing under coverage with S Corey Lynch picking up the deep route about 10 yards downfield. Lynch played it better than expected, but Rodgers’ perfect throw still gave the Packers a chance. Jennings just dropped it.”

Defenses are scheming to force the Packers to intemediate routes that take a bit longer to develop, taking away the slant and quick hitter hoping they get the sack.

Also, as posted before, it was ill advised for Rodgers to throw that ball into the coverage leading to his 2nd interception, but the ball hit Jennings in the pads and was more than catchable.

CSS said in November 10th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

Egocentric was mine, alright, and unnecessary. But Full of himself and “thinks he’s better than he is” are synonymns, or close to it.
-
And you DID compare the way you evaluate Favre with the way you evaluated Rodgers…
-
Also, “having a feeling” IS implying… Lipstick on a pig…
-
Appreciate that you moderated your tone, BTW. I think we won’t settle in this. I still think that that specific statement was improper… But I do have to take it into a contest, and I do completely agree with the point of your entire post… And I also think (I think a lot, I know) that it’s the coaches job to keep players focused, and to demand they perform at the highest level every snap…

PackersRS said in November 10th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

Woody – “To devote an entire blog on this subject matter is far from being even-keeled when discussing the NFL”
-
Where is it written that all discussion regarding the NFL must be ‘even-keeled’? Emotional reactions are EXACTLY what blogs are all about. This aint the Wall Street Journal…

Aaron Nagler said in November 10th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

CSS, great post. I knew it had to be more there than many people realize. If the short passing yac attack is available, you’ve got to figure they’d use it.

Glorious80s said in November 10th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

Let’s see – this is a blog oriented to fan commnetary. Some who contribute seem to feel “fans” shouldn’t comment unless they are in sync with his position. And if not, we should know enough to shut up until he approves of your position.
_____
Fans can say what ever the hell they want! The fans pay for the team top to bottom. TV revenue – FANS, Gate Receipts – FANS, Geer – FANS, Packer Stock – FANS! We, as fans, have every right to express our views no mater what you think. We might be right, we might be wrong, but we can and will express them.
____
To summarize, argue your position against those you deem incorrect. Don’t ridicule because you think no other view is acceptable because (God forbid) we are only fans.

Ron La Canne said in November 11th, 2009 at 10:59 am

Thanks PackerRs

Changes do not have to produce ‘droughts’ if managed properly. ergo, TT and MM are not leading or producing. Better team preparations were needed before bringing AR on the scene.

greenbaypackerbob said in November 11th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

“If he is going to be a franchise player he can’t use his patented “crouch down” in the face of an on coming rush technique. You know what he is not doing while he is crouched down in a stupid yoga pose, looking straight at his linemen’s crotches? He is not going through his progressions and identifying open receivers. ”
An interesting theory. Someone should ask him about it.

Glorious80s said in November 11th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

I’ve been reading your blog site for a few
weeks now, and the voices are getting louder. After being chosen as legitimate
Super Bowl contenders (post pre-season) our
beloved Pack is face down bleeding. One
glaring factoid I’m not hearing is: what the hell happened to our home field invincibility? Reggie has to be spinning in
his grave. Where is: THIS IS OUR HOUSE!!!

steve in Minneapolis said in November 13th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Auction


Sponsors


Streetviews