Improve From Within: Aaron Rodgers

Improving from within is not just reserved for the first and second year players.

Improve from within.

That's the mantra we've heard since Ted Thompson came on board, from both Ted and coach McCarthy, that this team would "improve from within". After getting back to the playoffs in 2009, fans are understandably anxious for the team to take the proverbial "next step". In other NFL cities, it is somewhat easier for fans to follow their favorite teams' process as they go about trading for guys, signing free agents and generally trying to improve the roster.

For Packer fans, its a bit more difficult, as Ted Thompson, especially this offseason, has pretty much doubled-down on the "Improve from within" mantra. He spent incredible amounts of money to keep his own guys in the fold and drafted guys who may or may not make immediate impacts. (Though with Jolly's suspension, it would seem to be sooner rather than later for Neal and Wilson - and who knows what happens with Burnett when the pads go on)

But what doesn't get talked about a whole lot, except by me, just because I LOVE being called a 'hater' - is that the most improving being done from "within" should be done by guys who are already playing at a high level. If the Packers' blue-chip players play even better, to compliment expected improvement from guys like Brandon Underwood and Brad Jones, this will be a juggernaut of a team.

I wanted to point out some areas in need of improvement, some obvious, some less so, before camp starts to see what kind of adjustments, if any, the players and coaches in question may have made over the offseason.

The first, and probably most obvious, if the need for Aaron Rodgers to improve at getting the ball out of his hand, but specifically on three step drops. Rodgers actually did an admirable job last season of improving his five-step releases, an area that Tom Clements had Rodgers focus on last offseason. But the three step drop seemed to give Rodgers problems at times last season, though, much like the offense in general, he improved in this area as the season wore on.

Take a look at the clip below and we'll chat on the other side.

Now, it's impossible to tell what Rodgers is looking at. The route combos and coverages are completely out of frame. But what IS in frame is Colledges' (admittedly weak) attempt at cutting Jared Allen. That block is specifically used on a three-step drop because by the time the defensive end is able to recover and go after the quarterback, the ball should be long gone.

Again, I can't say what Rodgers is seeing or not seeing with any certainty - but what I can say is that he needs to know within a second after the ball being snapped if he needs to look either on the backside of this play or to Ryan Grant for the check-down. He simply holds onto his initial read for far too long for a three step drop. He HAS to know this (and of course, he does) He compounds the problem by tucking and running TOWARD the side of the attempted cut-block.

Yes, I know. This is incredibly nit-picky. But Rodgers is on the cusp of greatness and the great ones ALWAYS look to improve their game, from the moment they enter the league until the day they retire. If Rodgers can improve just in this one small area, he and the offense will be even more potent than they were in 2009.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (26)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
misterj's picture

July 28, 2010 at 10:18 am

He doesn't even have a second to look at any routes because of Barbre and Colledge's colossal blocking on this play.

0 points
0
0
maxginsberg's picture

July 28, 2010 at 10:21 am

I read that Rodgers has been watching film and working on this during the offseason. Your assessment is "nit-picky" but valid, nonetheless.

Rodgers has been so impressive, it's easy to forget he's only been starting for two seasons. Based on what he's done in so little time, he'll grow out of this quickly.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:08 am

"Yes, I know. This is incredibly nit-picky."

Not at all. I think that's a totally warranted knock.

#12 is starting to be mentioned in the same breath as Peyton, Tom and Drew. It's obvious he's playing at a high level, BUT, to get where we all think he could go, he's going to have to start nit-picking his game. He does everything so well currently that to take the next step it's going to be the little tweaks here and there that get him/us over the top.

GBP 4 LIFE

P.S.- Bought you and the crew a beer this weekend, peep your paypal acct. Have a blast.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:23 am

Like misterj said, I think in this play it was 0.5 a second late. Mostly I would blame the AWFUL, AWFUL blocking by both "tackles" (I can't call Colledge and Barbre Offensive Tackles).

I think Rodgers' main area of improvement is the checkdown receiver. I don't see him using it very often, and when he does, he delivers the ball way too strong.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:49 am

"(I can’t call Colledge and Barbre Offensive Tackles)."

Me neither. I can call them offensive however! Too easy.

BUP

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:30 am

Part of the problem early on was the inexperience of McCarthy and Rodgers combined. Go back and look at some of those early season sacks and you will see defenses running a calculated risk on the deep ball by baiting the offense/Rodgers. Defenses were cheeting the safety pre-snap to make it look as though the deep middle or deep sideline was open only to cheet coverage back to the middle at the snap. Basically, they were baiting McCarthy and Rodgers to wait on the deep ball, confident they could beat the tackles and pressure Rodgers.

You're spot on with his adjustment on the 3-step drop, but McCarthy/Rodgers stopped getting gready on their pre-snap reads and calls after that Buc's game. There were a lot of issues addressed following that game, I'm confident it won't be an issue this year (or atleast a minimal issue).

0 points
0
0
nerdmann's picture

July 28, 2010 at 01:58 pm

I agree. Definitely seemed to me they started going back to a more traditional WCO ball control offense.
I'd like to see them stay with that. I know they really like AR12's deep ball, but he'll get the long completion through YAC. He'll have opportunities to go up top when CBs start trying to jump on the slants too. Just be patient.
I just LOVE it when they drain that clock. Keeps Jarrett Bush of the field.

0 points
0
0
cole's picture

July 28, 2010 at 02:25 pm

Haha can't have a day go by with out a JB knock. I love it.

0 points
0
0
SpiderPack's picture

July 28, 2010 at 08:27 pm

I agree. They should control the ball with more quick slants and yes SCREENS(somehow...with BJ or hopefully Starkman). But Aaron was brilliant with the longball, he just needs a wee bit more accuarcy there during tense-high-need moments. Don't anybody call him off those.

0 points
0
0
Tarynfor12's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:31 am

Please,this play was designed for the motion guy to go right and shift coverage and the play was for Grant to get the hit going up the middle clean as seen,but he takes to long to get there and the right side forces Aaron into Allen who was stoped by Colledge for the time.Grant blew this one.But Aaron would have been smarter to go behind Grant.Min had the D called and would have been toasted if Grant moved faster.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:42 am

No, this play was not 'designed' for Grant. Grant was the final 'check down' option and neither a primary or secondary read. His primary read (pre-snap) was the motion receiver (look at his eyes/helmet) but the linebacker pulled of his blitz and peeled away with the receiver. As a right handed passer, Rodgers had Edwards pressure coming in has face and made a poor decision by rolling into the defender on his blind-side (Allen) that was only chopped. College wasn't supposed to sustain a block.

Grant was in position just fine, the defense adjusted perfectly to the motion and Rodgers never had a pocket (nor did it appear the play was designed for it, looked like a 'quick hit' read.

0 points
0
0
Tarynfor12's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:52 am

Sorry but no.His eyes to the helmet is what drew the lb to the motion rec and opened the middle for the dump to grant who didn't look back or hit the line fast enough.Rodgers looked right to grant when the LB split with the rec,which parted the sea for Grant.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:00 pm

When in the last two decades, outside of the screen, has a running back ever been the primary receiver on a play?

Never....

0 points
0
0
Tarynfor12's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:16 pm

Saying designed for Grant was the wrong wording,but he was the out when the LB spilt with the motion rec which cleared the middle.If the LB stays put he is now a blocker as he was in postion to do so if the rec came back across the middle,but when the LB went to cover, Grant was the guy and is clearly wide open but never turned till he hit the 22 yd line.Grant was the man if the LB split and wasn't if he stayed.Grant blew this play.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:21 pm

Watch it again, Edwards (linebacker) is just off the screen on his drop. He's sitting on Grant's jock. No, Grant isn't open.

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:38 pm

Sure, but having Grant get hit and stopped for no gain is much better than the alternative.

0 points
0
0
Graffin's picture

July 28, 2010 at 07:07 pm

The LB seems to drop back and leave Grant open for a 2 or 3 yard gain (if Grant turned around a second sooner), but from this clip you can't really tell how close the LB is because he's out of frame. If Edwards continued dropping back, I agree with Taryn, Rodgers had a plausible out. But it's impossible to tell from this clip. Need another angle.

0 points
0
0
Brett Cristino's picture

July 28, 2010 at 11:52 am

Terrible way to get your first response from Rodgers on twitter Aaron haha. Valid criticism though, and it's great knowing that his only glaring weakness is such a minor fixable problem.

0 points
0
0
PackersThad's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:00 pm

I'm sorry, but the only thing I see in this place is Barbre's HORRIBLE HORRIBLE blocking on that play...That was just inexcusable. If I was Rodgers, and I saw that on replay after the game, I would be hurling a football at Barbre's head the same way Rodgers chucked it at T.J. Lang's head for that ESPN video...

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Cabbage patch! Cabbage patch!

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 28, 2010 at 07:06 pm

I was going to say the same thing- I can hardly peel my eyes off of Barbre's horrendous effort to even look at Colledge's failure.

0 points
0
0
Tarynfor12's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:23 pm

It's always easy to blame the scapegoat(s)as in Colledge and Barbre for everything.I'm not saying Barbre did a great job,but I see a lot more as the ball should have been gone and Edwards is then a non factor,but Grant saw the LB split and didn't hit the line fast enough and turn for the dump.He was the out when the LB split.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

July 28, 2010 at 12:53 pm

I think you're right. If Grant had been a split second quicker, the ball could've went to him.

But, to me, there was still an option on that play: the slot receiver. He wasn't covered as tight as the others.

0 points
0
0
PackersThad's picture

July 28, 2010 at 01:41 pm

I wouldn't put it all on Colledge, however, I would definitely put a lot of the blame on Barbre...whether it was a three step drop, or a one step drop, Barbe was playing two-hand touch with his guy...he didn't stop his forward momentum AT ALL. Rodgers reacted to Barbre's man's pressure, if Barbre played that play at any sort of professional level, Rodgers would've had at least a half second more...

0 points
0
0
cole's picture

July 28, 2010 at 02:30 pm

I think the true brilliance of A-rods season last year was how he survived with such horrible blocking, that is until tauscher came back. We should be solid this year. Didn't we go 7-1 once he came back?

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

July 29, 2010 at 10:19 am

He came back around week 5 I think, started a couple of weeks later. It should have been right around the 9th game, sounds about right. Man though, there was such a noticeable difference immediately when Tausch got back in there, we're gonna be fine this year (hopefully TEEJ heals quickly).

GBP 4 LIFE

0 points
0
0