D.J. Swearinger's Positive Qualities Mask Slow 40 Time

It's not out of the question that the South Carolina safety could be a late first-round target of the Green Bay Packers with the 26th overall selection.

South Carolina safety D.J. Swearinger. Photo by Brian Carriveau of CheeseheadTV.com.

D.J. Swearinger is a WYSIWYG safety: What you see is what you get.

He's everything you see on film. The first thing that sticks out from the South Carolina prospect is his tackling, both in his ability to deliver a crushing blow and also wrap up to create the perfect form tackle. The two are not mutually exclusive, and Swearinger does both well.

Turnovers in the secondary are not created simply by grabbing interceptions. For Swearinger, he's just as liable to force a fumble with a hard hit as he is to snag an errant pass.

Such was the case in the Gamecocks' Outback Bowl game against Michigan this past season when Swearinger forced a fumble, which assisted in a five-point victory and helped to secure an 11-win season for South Carolina.

"It’s the playmaker mentality," said Swearinger at the NFL Combine. "Teams want to see turnovers. They want to see you make plays. For that, going in and securing the tackle and helping to get the turnover at the same time, it’s just being a playmaker."

These are among the top qualities for a player who's very likely to be among the top five safeties coming off the board at this year's upcoming NFL Draft.

One of Swearinger's weaknesses, however, is his straight-line speed, as evidenced by his time of 4.67 seconds in the 40-yard dash at the Combine. Only four safeties ran a slower time.

When Texas' Kenny Vaccaro ran a time of 4.63 seconds, it created a minor stir for the player generally considered to be the top-rated safety in this year's draft class.

And if Swearinger ran a time .04 seconds slower than Vaccaro, that should raise a red flag, right?

"I'm a firm believer that a workout's a workout," said former Packers safety and current Chicago Tribune analyst Matt Bowen in an interview with Cheesehead TV. "Football is a transitional game, it's a game of angles, not a game of straight line.

"Unless you're going to be covering a kick, that's when you use that 40-yard dash time. If you're playing DB against a wide receiver, you don't get to start next to him with your hand on the line in shorts. You have to open your hips, run, go over the top."

According to Bowen, 40 time is an inadequate metric for a position that's more about playing angles and transitional speed.

Fortunately for Swearinger he had a much better performance in the three-cone drill that is better indicator of his change-of-direction skills. His time of 6.70 seconds was bettered by only two other safeties at the Combine.

To look at Swearinger's 40 time in a vacuum and dismiss him as a top prospect would be a mistake, because there's so much more to like.

"I’m a leader first and foremost," said Swearinger. "I have great ball skills. I’ve played every position in the back end, from corner to strong safety to free safety to the nickel. I’m a versatile player. I’m not only just a safety, I’m an athlete."

Over the course of his college career, Swearinger has six interceptions, 6.5 tackles for a loss and three touchdowns scored on the defensive side of the football.

Measuring in at fractions over 5-10, Swearinger's height leaves a little more to be desired, especially when tasked with covering the tall tight ends invading today's NFL.

But Swearinger thinks he has certain intangibles that make up for any perceived lack of height.

"I have instincts that coaches can’t coach. You can’t coach instincts," said Swearinger. "I have great ball skills, great feet and hips. I’m going to stay in that film room and be a hard worker day in an day out."

After the Packers released Charles Woodson in the offseason, there's a spot open in the defensive backfield for a starting safety in Green Bay. There will be competition from holdovers like Jerron McMillian and M.D. Jennings, but the job is up for grabs.

It's perhaps possible that Swearinger could be a first-round target of the Packers, particularly if Vaccaro or Floria International's Jonathan Cyprien are already gone by the time the 26th pick is on the clock.

"His stock's rising a little bit if you talk to people," said Bowen. "The arrow's pointing up on him. This is the kind of time you want it to."

Brian Carriveau is the author of "It's Just a Game: Big League Drama in Small Town America," and editor of Cheesehead TV's "Pro Football Draft Preview." To contact Brian, email [email protected].

0 points
 

Comments (15)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Derek in CO's picture

April 11, 2013 at 12:02 pm

haven't seen this kid play, but he's about the #5 ranked safety for this draft and played against pretty good college competition. Like his interview as well. A kid like this you would hope might be available in round 3 or so. Don't know if we need another guys with initials though. Seems we already have enough AJs, DJs, CJs, BJs, and TJs. Think about that one.

0 points
0
0
Ma Linger's picture

April 11, 2013 at 12:14 pm

Sounds like a third to me certainly not a first. Two slow and smallish

0 points
0
0
Bibbon Hazel's picture

April 11, 2013 at 12:24 pm

I know a lot of fans want a safety and its a need. On top of that there are some good DBs in the draft but Tinkering Ted is going to ride J-Mac, The Doctor and Richardson. Perhaps he takes one later but I wouldn't count on Cyprien, Swearinger, or Elam unless they drop to the late 2nd or even 3rd. Tinkering Ted scheming again!

0 points
0
0
Drealyn Williams's picture

April 12, 2013 at 07:07 pm

I also don't feel that safety is a big need. I would hope TT passes on Safeties in the first 2 rounds and fix/upgrade that D-Line.

0 points
0
0
Franklin Hillside's picture

April 11, 2013 at 01:26 pm

He'll feed you to Wu's pigs.

Oh, wait, Swearinger, not Swearengen.

0 points
0
0
aussiepacker's picture

April 11, 2013 at 05:30 pm

LOL. Was thinking of the same man when i read the guys name.

0 points
0
0
Stroh's picture

April 11, 2013 at 05:38 pm

Keep this name in mind... Sanders Commings. Hear the Packers were really interested in him as a Safety. Played CB at U Ga bjt gas build of safety at 6. 216. Plays physical good in press coverage. Play centerfield in baseball so knows angles and how to track a ball. Has the speed at 4.41 that Thompson loves. He's never drafted a safety that runs over 4.5.

My mid round sleeper for a Safety that fits Thompson's profile.

0 points
0
0
MarkinMadison's picture

April 11, 2013 at 06:59 pm

What I've read on him is that his tackling is not great - not good at wrapping up, not good in run support. Would like to see a sure tackler in the middle to help out with AP and Kapernick.

0 points
0
0
Stroh's picture

April 11, 2013 at 11:34 pm

Read the same. Just sayin... That's what I heard/read. Sorry don't have link, but it sure sounded like the Packers had serious interest. All players in the mid/late rounds have holes in their games. Maybe the Packers believe w/ a little coaching/development he'll get better tackling in space. Fundamentals and technique after that its just want to.

0 points
0
0
MarkinMadison's picture

April 12, 2013 at 11:47 am

No I get it. Dude has some serious measurables. I was shocked when I saw the comments on his tackling, because his size for the S position is superior, and for a CB he's a giant. Maybe part of the problem is that he was playing CB so much of the time that he was not focused on his tackling.

0 points
0
0
cow42's picture

April 13, 2013 at 08:26 am

so he can't tackle?
perfect! he fits the mold the Packers look for in their defensive backs!

bring him on in.

more guys with "potential" who our stellar coaches could teach how to play a brand new position.

sounds great.

all i want are just a couple of players who actually enjoy hitting people.

IN MY OPINION this damn team is so damn soft it just pisses me right the hell off.

physical Packer players (IN MY OPINION)...
1.matthews
2.bishop (if he can ever play again)
3.pickett
4.sitton
5.bulaga (even though i think this dude is way overrated - the team ran better w/ barclay)

...and there's your list (IN MY OPINION).

-3rd most physical team in the division (IN MY OPINION)
-12th most physical team in the NFC - above only Detroit, Philadelphia, Carolina, and New Orleans (IN MY OPINION).

PLEASE DRAFT SOME BIG, STRONG, PHYSICAL, MEAN PLAYERS!

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

April 13, 2013 at 09:53 am

You see that Fox Sports Wisconsin story on Bishop from the other day. He insists he's 100% and has cleared every physical hurdle. Hard to know until he puts the pads on, but it was encouraging.

0 points
0
0
packsmack25's picture

April 11, 2013 at 06:18 pm

I think that safeties in a Capers system DO have to have straight line speed to cover large areas created by different zone blitzes. You can't just say that you don't need speed at safety in the NFL as a blanket statement. Yes it's about angles, but it's also about recovery in a lot of schemes.

0 points
0
0
Lars's picture

April 12, 2013 at 10:52 am

What positive qualities? He's nothing but a glorified head hunter. That $%$$ won't fly in the NFL. Throw in the slow foot speed and what have you got? A slower version of Taylor Mays. No thanks.

0 points
0
0
ted, of bill and tedp's picture

April 13, 2013 at 09:53 am

taylor mays, he is not.

i like swearinger. i agree with cow and think we need more aggressive, physical players, and swearinger fits that mold. he was a starting, play making, superior safety in the sec...that tells me all i need to know about his speed

0 points
0
0