Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Take Your Pick

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

There are NINETEEN new faces that will be walking into the Green Bay Packers Locker room -11 draft picks and eight UDFAs. The last two years, the Packers have drafted 24 players and all but three made the team. In addition, a least one UDFA has made the Packers for 19 straight years (three last season). Ther roster turnover has been significant and will likely continue this season, but it's hard to see as high a percentage of this year's new faces making the team. Regardless, there are sure starters among this year's draftees and some long shots who will need to surprise. I'm sure you've read volumes of information on them by now, but here are some of my thoughts...

Favorite Draft pick - Javon Bullard. It's been years that I've been sitting on my perch pining (not for the fjords, but for) a thumper of a safety. Someone that will make receivers take their eye off the ball as they prepare to be leveled. Bullard is that guy. Throw in the fact that he has experience in the slot and both safety roles, and he's going to be fun to watch and a fun chess piece for Hafley to play with.

Least Favorite Pick - Travis Glover. I threw his name in as the #25 OT for the CHTV Draft guide, but honestly, just to give a small school kid some recognition. He wasn't even on the radar for a lot of draft analysts and I highly doubt he would have been drafted if the Packers didn't use pick 202 on him. He has the position versatility the Packers are in love with, but not the athleticism, with a 4.71 RAS featuring very poor shuttle and 3-cone times.

Speaking of position versatility on the offensive line, remember when "continuity' was THE THING you wanted among your offensive line group? You wanted those same five players together as a unit in the same spots every game. To that, the Packers say pfft! We;ve seen them gradually go away from that idea over the last 4-5 years, but it now appears it's hardly a consideration. I mean how many NFL teams rotated healthy starting offensive guards all season like the Packers did last year? Probably none.

Jordan Morgan - So here are my feelings on Jordan Morgan. I had him as OT #7 in the CHTV Draft Guide. I though he would go after Tyler Guyton, who instead went a few picks after Morgan was nabbed by the Packers as the sixth OT taken. Morgan has a lot of what the Packers look for; experience, movement ability and potential multi-position versatility. To me, Morgan is the perfect Packers tackle to guard conversion prospect, but the problem is he's a first-rounder. If the Packers are taking an OT in the first round, they want him at OT. The only way he becomes a guard is if he fails as a tackle. The one thing i didn't like about Morgan was that he absorbs a lot of contact from rushers, He needs to shore up his hand placement to keep them out of his chest, where power rushers can walk him back into the QB. The good news is that hand and arm technique is a fixable thing. It's not like saying he doesn't have quick feet - that's something you either have or don't and Morgan has it in spades. Overall, while I'm not excited about the pick, I'm not disappointed either.

Edgerrin Cooper - Well, Packers fans got a Cooper, just not the one they wanted. Like the other Cooper, this Cooper has one hell of a highlights video. It looks like the Packers have themselves a hyped-up "see ball, get ball" version of Quay Walker. I think you'll be seeing a lot of 4-2-5 with Quay and Edgerrin flying around. The devaluation of the true Mike linebacker in the NFL is real and it has the Packers at the forefront of that movement.

Thelonious Monk - Well, the Packers got a versatile offensive lineman from Duke, but it wasn't fan-favorite Graham Barton. Under-the-radar Jacob Monk, who played center, guard and tackle over five seasons as a starter for Duke, was the object of the Packers desire, as they traded a sixth round pick in order to move up five spots and nab Monk. Monk had the fastest 10 yard split at the combine (1.66) among all offensive linemen. No offense to Monk, but looks-wise, you wouldn't say hey, that's a 9+ RAS athlete, but he is.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

15 points
 

Comments (141)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
10ve 💚's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:30 am

Good morning Al! Go Pack Go!

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
HawkPacker's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:52 am

I love what we have done with the center of the defense with the ILB's and Safeties. We have a lot of flexibilities, immediate starters and a new DC for 2024. I can't wait to see how it comes together.

It may take a few games (or a bit more) for this new D to gel but it should be so much more exciting to watch than the last few years!

+ REPLY
14 points
15
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:32 am

Indeed :)

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:54 am

LOL-The fans didn't get anything they wanted this draft.

With all the millions of dollars spent on scouting
and pre -draft info. We got Hosed.
-Brian got exactly what he wanted. Turn-Over.
Message; Either win or you're gone.
Point : MLF days are numbered.
Because when you can't put your heart on your sleeve.
The team will never be together in the tough times.
And then will see how we have to save money.
To change the failures of a GM's vision.
Super-bowl- Are we really talking Super-bowl?
Or support Brian Gutekunst?

+ REPLY
-30 points
2
32
Cheezehead72's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:14 am

Dude really. So you want a GM to make picks the fans want. Sorry but that is not a leader. A leader makes the tough decisions and puts his career on the line to do what is right.

We all know that you love DeJean. Yes he might be a good players but we got an OT and we got a Slot CB/S that might be better than DeJean.

Gute is a very good GM and yes I have had my concerns with MLF but he is still an above average HC. I just wish he was not the play caller or tha he was the OC play caller.

+ REPLY
10 points
13
3
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:48 am

He always loved the players that are trending on the three sites he follows. Until another trends more that is. That’s why he loved the celebrity drafts every year. Next he will ditch the ones that fail and claim he backed others while constantly bringing up players we missed, whether or not he advocated for them.

It’s an annual cycle and tradition going back more than a decade. He was hating on TT for picking Rodgers, just back then he wrote in prose. He was still hating on him and eulogizing Favre incessantly into the season we won a Superbowl on our precursor site and elsewhere. Some of it can still be unearthed if one bothers to dig.

+ REPLY
7 points
8
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:50 am

" just back then he wrote in prose"

Wow he wrote in prose. I didn't think it was possible for him to write more than haiku style.

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
Duhawk_47's picture

May 02, 2024 at 01:21 pm

These history lessons really do help. I've been around for 5+ years now and I'm just starting to see the big picture, thanks to yours and others' connecting-the-stockholder-dots.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:49 am

Andy Herman said he didn't see where Cooper DeJean fit in the to Hafley defense. DeJean is an outside zone corner who we "think" can play the slot and safety but that is all a guess right now. Compare that to Bullard who DID play safety AND cover the slot all at a VERY high level. After more studying I think this is the better route to have gone.

+ REPLY
6 points
8
2
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:13 am

Exactly, what people here wanted DeJean to be is a projection. A transition from a slot role that Bullard has already made and very successfully.

If Dejean made a transition to S (he’s more likely to be playing slot full time in a D of the Barry type now) successfully that involves acumen not yet demonstrated. If that’s there (and I think the odds are decent) then eventually he might be as good, maybe he might even be a little better than Bullard perhaps. But that’s neither a certainty, nor current.

Bullard is the better FS and SS prospect now and they are similar in the slot. Absolutely the better option to be lining up next to McKinney in September. There’s a pretty realistic chance he might always be.

+ REPLY
3 points
5
2
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:17 am

Had Barry somehow still been the DC then DeJean would have made perfect sense. Luckily Barry got kicked to the curb.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
packer132's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:29 am

Do you wait to get high or drunk before you post? True Packer fans who know football love this draft as well as the 2023 draft. Did you know there are 32 teams trying to get the best players? Gute got competition at all levels, and the best 53 will be on the field. The GM is not in a popularity contest and avoided a 3-4 year rebuild after your man crush Rodgers left. Few GM's in the NFL could have accomplished that. Many think the Packers are primed for a Super Bowl run. Just not you. Who is your team, anyway? Not that we care but its hard to pinpoint. It sure is not the Green Bay Packers.

+ REPLY
12 points
15
3
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:55 am

The fact that Gute doesn't have to worry about appeasing an owner makes things better. Even though Murphy has done some odd things, he has show patience with his GMs and that allows them to build the roster according to their strengths. Doing this has allowed GB to be a top team in the NFL for 3 straight decades. Compare that to Cleveland who have had 9 GMs since 2000 it isn't surprising that they have been a bad team year over year. Their owners expect that by the GMs 2nd year that they will have turned around the team and if they haven't then they might get 1 more season and then fired.

+ REPLY
3 points
5
2
Packers0808's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:37 am

Are you ever going to grow up and quit being an attention seeker? Risible.

+ REPLY
6 points
7
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:41 am

“We got Hosed.” Which of course, is a million times worse than “We got hosed.” That upper case “h” is what separates champions from also-rans. Ha! Thanks for the laugh, as usual!

+ REPLY
9 points
10
1
Johnblood27's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:12 am

Bowl Super have cant.
gm ego driver,!
players Some play - most not
coach Cannot lead
follow will not,
grass yellow, forest purple
trees watch fall!

+ REPLY
15 points
16
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:24 am

“LOL” is over-used, but in this case it’s 100% true! Love it!

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:56 am

BEAUTIFUL!!!

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:46 am

"The team will never be together in the tough times.
And then will see how we have to save money."

You do realize that the current CBA requires teams to use up 90% of their cap space on player contracts over a 5 year period right? Teams aren't able to pay less and bank all the extra money. Between this year and last year the Packers have had close to $100M in dead money. That is money that counts against the cap for players no longer on the roster. Having that much dead money makes it such that you cannot afford expensive players so you have to get a lot of rookies as they are cheap. As of right now the Packers have $68M in cap space next year. That will change as contracts are signed by rookies and Jordan Love, however, they are finally out of salary cap purgatory next year.

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:25 am

The draft isnt about fans getting their way. Its about building a team. You have the maturity of a child.

+ REPLY
4 points
6
2
murf7777's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:44 am

You must have so much fun being an irritant to many on this board….lol

+ REPLY
5 points
6
1
barutanseijin's picture

May 01, 2024 at 03:20 pm

To fathom the unfathomable, one empties the mind of all preconceptions. Away with grammar! Smash syntax! Pulverize mathematics and logic. Forget about continuity. One does not equal one. I am not i. Only punctuation can destroy punctuation!

Some of us are better at this stuff than others.

+ REPLY
7 points
7
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

May 01, 2024 at 03:27 pm

LaFleur ain't getting fired anytime soon. Many fans would be thrilled with a 56-27 record over the end of a hall of fame QB career and a transition to a new QB. When you coach the youngest roster in the league to beat the #2 seed in the playoffs, and barely miss beating the #1 seed, you don't get fired. Period.

This team has ALREADY been together in tough times. Look at last season.

Or are you just mad about Aaron Jones? Gutey just keeps putting a winning team on the field. What else do you want?

+ REPLY
5 points
6
1
Coach Cleve Steamer's picture

May 02, 2024 at 08:54 am

Pump the breaks! Holeder, It sounds like you're really frustrated. Expectations unmet can be tough to deal with, especially when things don't go as expected. It's okay to feel upset. If you want to talk more about it, I'm here to listen.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Duhawk_47's picture

May 02, 2024 at 01:18 pm

If i squint my eyes just right, this reads:

Stock didn't get anything they wanted in the draft.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
packerbackerjim's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:56 am

MarShawn Lloyd is a guy I think is someone who is going to contribute to the sustained success of the team, picking up the responsibilities in MLF’s offense.

+ REPLY
1 points
3
2
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:58 am

I am looking forward to both Cooper and Bullard on D. Not just their skills but their attitudes. When is the last time the Packer D had an overall reputation as aggressive and downright NASTY?

Agree on Morgan. Traits vs flaws. Coaching can help with technique, but it can’t turn lead feet into quick ones.

Also eager to see those pleasant surprises from under the radar guys. Seems like there’s at least one very year.

GPG!

+ REPLY
8 points
8
0
Spock's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:34 am

"Not just their skills but their attitudes. " THIS ^^^^

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Bearmeat's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:14 am

Yeah buddy. Worried about how Bullard will hold up size wise. And Cooper needs to learn how to stand in the hole and shed a block. But for second round, they should make a difference on the defense.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:53 am

Cooper is very good at shedding blocks. None of these ILBs are best in reactive play though. They are all better attacking the ball, the gaps or the QB. How that is managed will be interesting. This appears to be a very different philosophy as well as system.

Bullard isn’t particularly small for a S, he is a similar size to McKinney, who has played over 400 box snaps himself. He is small for a big nickel, but I think that’s why we have acquired multiple options.

+ REPLY
3 points
5
2
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:28 am

Hes a physical player who plays much bigger than he actually is. Not worried about his size being an issue.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
murf7777's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:54 am

Cooper isn’t very big either, his frame is thin. They are going all out for speed, which has been happening for a while now. Hope they know what they are doing. If so, this D could become very dynamic.

+ REPLY
1 points
3
2
T7Steve's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:23 am

"eager to see those pleasant surprises from under the radar guys"

Like the last pick in the draft?

I have more confidence that he'll make it with the chip on his shoulder than any of the others taken after about round 4.

+ REPLY
0 points
3
3
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:25 am

Happens every year. The fun part is that right now we have (almost) no idea who it’ll be!

+ REPLY
1 points
3
2
Tundraboy's picture

May 02, 2024 at 11:11 pm

That is a fun part of football. Don't know why anyone disagreed with you. Some people are never happy

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:16 am

Kalen King was viewed as CB 1/2 going into the 2023 CFB season. He had a rough season AND didn't test well at the combine so he fell to the end of R7 instead of R1/2. I really think the Packers got a big steal there.

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:59 am

Unlike Cooper Dejean, King does not have the body to project to safety. He also played the perimeter primarily, not inside as much as Dejean. Dejean is a much more physical tackler while King is much more fluid in transitions and much more suited to tight press coverage.

Aside from that their athleticism is similar and so is one other thing: they both have extremely good natural instincts and ball skills.

King is a huge potential steal as long as he’s used with a center field focus not as a primary boundary option in the pros. In the 7th round, that’s a great find and a lighter slot option on obvious passing downs.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:19 am

King also played in the slot and did well at it.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:48 am

Yes, though I doubt he’s an option as a full time slot under Hafley based upon the run attributes Hafley has stressed for the role. I suspect Williams might be the early down back up there. As a sub package slot, I certainly see King as an asset.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:59 am

I'm wondering if their most common D is going to be 4-2-5 with 3 safeties (big nickle?). Have Bullard covering the slot, which he did VERY well in college, and either Williams or Oladapo next to McKinney. The mix of Bullard, Cooper, and either WIlliams or Oladapo brings a lot of run and hit to the D. These guys punish the opposing player who has the ball.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:01 am

I think we are going to see more variation in packages in game and more between games.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:06 am

Most D's play nickel more than base. And I do think the 5 DBs on the field will greatly depend on the upcoming opponent. Could see more Dime too.

Hafley seems very intent to customize who starts and how they will attack depending on the next team on the schedule. Barry rarely did this....it was mostly one size fits all for him.

There will be growing pains with this D, but the tone Hafley has already set tells me this is going to be very different. Higher risk, greater reward with the attacking mindset to pressure the QB and get T/Os.

Agree DoubleJ, there could be several games were 3, even 4 Safeties will be on the field more than 3 CBs with a S in the slot.

Drafting 3 Safeties joining McKinney and Johnson Jr will give Hafley, Ansley and Campanile lots of options.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Oppy's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:32 pm

Oladapo's tape is pretty nice.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:37 am

Morgan has GREAT feet. Bad footwork. You can teach technique. Trying to teach quick feet is much less successful. Same with his hands; 31 reps on bench press, his max is probably over 400. His usage of his hands has not been great and he knows it, which is why he's been working on it. Again, this is something coaches can address.

GB has the luxury of using him as depth this season if he can't win any position outright. In fact, his versatility could result in needing to dress one fewer O lineman, freeing up a spot somewhere else.

With the 4 additions to O line, hopefully we'll finally see Newman squeezed out.

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
T7Steve's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:02 am

Al wrote, "I mean how many NFL teams rotated healthy starting offensive guards all season like the Packers did last year? Probably none."

I think that started when Runyon was banged up and on a snap count. When they continued to do it after he said he was healthy, I thought "Oh no! They're going to have certain play packages for these guys that other teams will pick up!" That didn't seem to happen, or at least I couldn't pick it up.

In hindsight, Al, do you think they were trying to see what they had in Ryan before they decided to extend Runyon or let him walk?

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:06 am

I’m not Al, but I suspect they would seriously have considered bringing Runyon back at a reasonable price at a 5th or 6th OL contract level after his play later on as he got healthier. The contract Runyon got offered was the end of that. He got paid more than his career as a decent but not plus starter thus far suggests.

+ REPLY
2 points
5
3
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:22 am

Runyon got 3 years for $30M with $17M guaranteed. That is a bit too much IMO for a RG that was at best average to slightly above average. Last year Runyon had a 54.7 PFF grade which is below average.

+ REPLY
6 points
7
1
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:44 am

I agree. Runyon was better over his career than that, and at the end of last year, but he’s around about adequate starter grade over his first contract. That offer killed any reasonable justification for resigning him. A good deal for him.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
T7Steve's picture

May 01, 2024 at 01:49 pm

Makes me feel a little better at where the Packers O-line is when a guy that struggled to keep his starting gig last season is getting or would get top starter dollars on 25 teams (at least) around the NFL.

I was really sorry to see him go (great depth/ few penalties), but glad he got his paycheck if it makes him happy.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 03, 2024 at 11:31 am

We shall see. I think Runyan was vastly overpaid. I don't know why Runyan had a good year in 2021, then regressed to average in 2022, then cratered in 2023 for most of 2023 except for 5 games or so, which weren't the last 5 games of the year.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:09 am

Overall I am content with the draft. They filled the major holes in the roster and they got good players. I cannot say that they reached to big for any player. They might have reached a little but I am fine with that.

Most interesting pick is that I agree with Al on Bullard. He has a chance of being better than DeJean.

I will put the OL in its own category because they are never sexy picks. I like that they got Monk. His intelligence and ability to play multiple positions will make him an asset.

Most perplexing pick is Michael Pratt. Now I do believe he might be one of the steals of the 7th round. He could be the next Matt Flynn. My main concern is the Packers should not carry 4 QBs into training camp. They still have a young QB that needs reps and then they have a 1 year and a rookie who also need practice reps. I hate to say this I believe they might get rid of McGough.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:39 am

Growing up in the lean 70’s and 80’s, I saw the Pack get thrashed time after time by the Bears. Why? Largely due to GB’s inferior lines on both sides of the ball. While I agree that they’re not “sexy” picks, good lines lead to winning, and to me, winning is much sexier than losing, regardless of style.

However, for most of us here: if you need to see what “sexy” and successful looks like, just look in the mirror. Booyah! 😉

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
Cheezehead72's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:07 am

I agree with it starts up front and yes we need a good OL. I like that Gute made 3 OL picks because you never have enough big guys. An OL pick is not sexy because most fans especially myself do not know what is a good offensive line player or not. It is a very hard position to judge.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:34 am

For lack of a better measurement, I sort of “Maddenize” every other player on offense when the team has a good to great O-line. So, Josh Jacobs, for example, goes from an 80 to an 85, and so on. I realize that could be a gross oversimplification, but I think there’s very little argument that each “skill position” (not my term) is enhanced through great line play and diminished without it.

Ron Wolf said to build a team, you get a franchise QB (easier said than done), a left tackle, and then you build the defense.

Growing up, I knew James Lofton was a deadly weapon, but not when Lynn Dickey was getting hurried or sacked.

It was also when “real” free agency arrived in the NFL that the salaries of O-linemen skyrocketed. That’s all the evidence needed to understand their value!

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:05 am

In 2020 the Bucs secondary was not very good, however, their front 7 was able to stop the run AND rush the passer very well. The pass rush made the weaknesses in their secondary a moot point overall as the ball had to come out quickly.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:07 am

Pratt was a late 7th in a thinner draft than any of recent years due to the back log of Covid tailing out and the payments for image use to college players kicking in.

Picking a QB they rated then was wise because we saw other ones less well rated by pundits generally before and since getting big 6 figure guarantees in UDFA, which we do not do.

He keeps the pipeline going cheaply and adds competition. May the best man win.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:46 am

Pratt beat the #1 pick overall, in a very big game. Before the draft I was thinking that adding another QB would be a mistake, but this guy has been the real deal and what if that continues in the NFL?

I mean I LOVE Clifford as a backup, but what if he gets legitimately bumped to #3? I don't think that can happen by week 1 but whenever that might happen it means the tram got better as long as it's decided on merit. Pratt could also completely wash out as a pro. I have to call this a great pick, since it's Gutey's tenth this season.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:55 am

If Pratt outplays Clifford then great. If not he’s heading to the PS. If he does outplay Clifford then Clifford could probably be stashed too.

Clifford has the advantages of knowing the system, having played at a higher level of competition and having a better arm and a year with Clements. If Pratt can beat him out then he deserves to be elevated.

Personally Pratt’s arm strength being less than Clifford’s isn’t a big source of confidence. I think the Packers see Pratt as having a flawed throwing technique that they can fix on the PS and significantly enhance him. He’s shown signs of more arm than he can regularly replicate.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Guam's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:16 am

Unless the Packers plan on either Morgan or Dillard playing guard, the Packers didn't draft much competition for Rhyan and Newman. Monk is the only IOL drafted by the Packers and his primary role will likely be backing up Myers. Glover sounds more like a practice squad project than a member of the 53. I know Dillard has played some guard - has anybody seen game film of his play there?

Gute certainly gave Hafley some new toys to work with. Safety and linebacker are going to look very different this year. I think it might take half a season for Hafley to get everybody integrated into a cohesive unit, but I really like the possibilities.

+ REPLY
0 points
3
3
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:32 am

Monk is underrated. Morgan could easily be a G, and even more so early on. Glover too may be a G in reality (i doubt his feet can be so miraculously better trained to play T) and I do not rule out Trente Jones or Jenkins despite how we got them. They are good players, just pure Gs at this level.

We could easily see not just Tom at C, but Jenkins freed up as well. I’m not predicting it, but
Walker, Jenkins, Tom, Glover and Morgan
is not impossible any more than
Tom, Morgan, Jenkins, Rhyan and Walker.
Or
Walker, Jenkins, Tom, Morgan, C Jones.
And myriad variations including Monk and Jennings/T Jones and C Jones/Tenuta.

We have preconceived notions, but we don’t know what the Packers think of Caleb Jones and Tenuta or how they think Morgan, Monk, Glover, T Jones/Jennings fit and how near they are to competing.

I see plenty of plausible depth and plenty of options beyond the line you suggest on paper, but I think waiting to see who turns up ready to compete and where they end up doing so is a better option than fretting now.

I could just as easily see Glover, Jennings/T Jones on the PS and one of C Jones and Tenuta cut with Morgan simply playing as next man up. If Monk shows adequate functional strength, I wouldn’t rule him out from competing at C legitimately either.

Perhaps I’m more sanguine than some, but this was a particularly calculated draft in my opinion. They went mostly for players in tiers; able to contribute now, to contribute now in specific roles and who look ready to compete quickly for depth and perhaps to start if we get really lucky.

The one position that got away slightly was CB, but I believe that King will maybe save that day and that they are a lot higher in Rochelle than people realize.

As to Morgan, the guy pressed 31 times. Fix his foot technique and the upside in his power game is considerable. I’f do so as a G initially, simply because I think it’s easier to focus on that aspect and faster.

+ REPLY
5 points
7
2
Guam's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:54 am

It certainly is early to pass judgements on players, but what else do we have to do at this point in the off-season?

I would be very surprised if Glover is anything other than a PS project at this point, a la Rasheed Walker. I think to expect anything this year is a stretch. I'm not writing him off, but he needs some time and pro coaching to be able to contribute.

I think there are lots of potential combinations of the Packer O-line thanks to Gute's predilection for drafting versatile guys. While I think Morgan could play guard, Jersey Al made the point yesterday that if the Packers drafted him with their #1, the probably want him to play tackle. I wouldn't be surprised if he spent this season as the swing tackle and special teams tackle while he improves his hand placement techniques and then challenges for a starting spot next season. Or he is good enough now to push Walker to the bench.

That still leaves the question of the IOL. Jones, Tenuta and Telfort are all probably too tall to play inside. That leaves Jenkins, Myers, Rhyan, Newman and Monk plus free agents as IOL. I wonder if they might shift Dillard inside to provide some competition to Rhyan?

Lots of speculation, but I think the O-line could be in more flux than some fans think. There are lots of parts available to move.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:53 am

The possibilities for our 0 line increased dramatically! Hopefully they are all taught / coached as well as possible, legitimate competition is fostered, and evaluation is skillful. How the O line winds up I do not care, I just want them to DOMINATE, and at every position.

If Glover doesn't play a down this season I consider that a win; it just means there are at least 8 or 9 Packers that are better. 2-3 years from now counts!

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:23 am

They wanted Glover for a reason, that much is clear. What that reason is we do not know and it may well be flawed, but it exists.

Glover to me is an older Nijman whom we picked up as a UDFA. He’s got all the attributes one might look for physically but his technique seems never to have been refined. Most particularly his footwork. Loosing 20 pounds might have helped him there in terms of speed but not technically. Perhaps I’m wrong, and the Packers think him worth polishing, but despite his 6’6” height, I think he will be worked as a G.

The Packers seem to have confirmed his Senior bowl measurements: 6’6” at 317 pounds per the Packers.com. The senior bowl had him with longer arms and better vertical too than the Hula Bowl measurements, so he may be a tad more athletic than his RAS charts suggest. Just a quirk that makes no difference to my belief that he’s a G or a long term project. At 6’6” I’m betting on G. He’s currently just described as an OL.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:44 am

I think Monk is a guy who could instantly compete at RG for the starting spot. At the very least I think he will be the top interior backup at all 3 spots.

But a player that I think they are excited about is Jennings. I think he will be moved inside.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:55 am

With all the versatility, how many O linemen do they really have to dress? There are interesting possibilities! Depth has definitely improved.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:09 am

I'm guessing they will keep 10 on the 53. Maybe 9, but just gonna guess 10. And they will probably dress 8 for games. All a guess though.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:40 pm

A pretty good guess, IMO. The 5 starters from last year.
Then the New Guys (Morgan and Glover and Monk). That's 8 right there. So these FAs we've signed are competing with guys like Newman and Telfort and Jones.+

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 02, 2024 at 08:01 am

Monk bench pressed 31 times. If he can apply that effectively, which needs a few minor techniques tweaks, then I think he’s a viable contender at C and G. Neither Trente Jones not Donovan Jennings look like anything other than Gs in the pros. Neither of have feet as agile as Morgan and both have a smaller wingspan. I believe that’s why they were available as UDFAs.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 02, 2024 at 11:04 am

I think Morgan will win the LT position. Walker will become a backup OT. All the rest of the starting 5....Jenkins, Myers, Rhyan, Tom....will remain where they are. Until people get hurt.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:24 am

Edge Cooper is the only of the 11 draftees I had on my draft crush list that Gute selected. At least I got one right this year! That's unusual. It is going to be fun how Haf and LB coach Campanile deploy him with Walker and McDuffie.

Marshawn Lloyd is the selection that started as "ok, sounds fine" to "wow, this could be a significant draft surprise!" the more I read about him. He seems a perfect prospect for the Illusion of Complexity Offense. He may very quickly supplant AJD as the number 2 behind Jacobs. He is a quick deciding, one cut runner with great balance to go with his quickness and speed and excellent receiving skills. Only 5'9"+ ...but 220 lbs! An Abrahms M1 Tank!

The commonality I (again) see with this draft class is 11 prospects, with a solid, extensive resumes of consistent college production AND men who earned respect and leadership roles on their respective teams. Packers truly value character in the young men they hire.

Go and earn that 2024 Season Lombardi...GPG!

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:49 am

Pssst…the “secret” is to have about 150 names on your draft crush list…gives you a much better chance to walk away happy!

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:05 am

Ahh! I see said the blind man as he ran into a tree!

I only go down to around the 4th round in my crush hopes so I rarely get one selected. And more hits with Gute than with Ted. I think Rodgers was the only hit from Ted for me after he slipped past #10. Still amazed Ted got him. Still equally amazed TJ slipped to Ted and he let him slip to the Steelers.

I have had more success with Gute...getting both Watson and Doubs (was hoping for him if Watson got away) in 2022. Then getting both Mugrave and Kraft last year (I wanted one or the other and he gets both!)

However, I never walk away after the Packer Draft feeling unhappy or perplexed. It has been pounded into my little GM armchair brain it is folly to grade a draft the day after. It takes 2-3 years to evaluate objectively with production and performance contributions.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:08 am

The only reason I don't see Lloyd moving ahead of Dillon this year is pass protection and fumbling. He is a better runner but if you cannot pass protect and you fumble a lot you won't have a long career in the NFL. He is going to have to clean that up but that will take a year or two.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
Untylu1968's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:15 am

He hasn't fumbled once in the NFL! It's a fixable issue that will be remedied in OTAs, training camp, and the preseason.

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:50 am

Fumbling isn’t easy to fix. At best it takes time to learn better techniques until they are instinctive. However, as long as he progresses, it can be managed, as it was with Ahman Green. What will keep him and every RB out of meaningful snaps in a LaFleur O is a lack of very very competent, consistent protection skills.

That’s why they signed Dillon to be Taylor. That’s why Wilson was used so sparingly and other exciting prospects never got the chance while Taylor got snaps but was seldom given much offensive opportunity. If he is to play, Lloyd (and Wilson) are going to have to convince LaFleur that they can match Dillon’s prowess.

If one does them they will be the second back. If both do then Dillon may well be on another team absent him balling out as a runner with new found ferocity. Jadaveon Howard provides an interesting PS option to carry.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
dobber's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:30 am

That will be the book on him, though, and opponents will go out of their way to try to punch the ball loose when he has it...probably more aggressively than they attack the ball with other players who don't have a reputation for putting the ball on the ground. Makes it harder to shake that rep.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:59 am

He has to clean up fumbling, obviously. Pass pro is hugely important, as it should be. We don't know how quickly he might be able to learn this, if ever.

I hope they practice all the peanut punching on HIM :)

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:57 am

I agree, Lloyd could prove to be "THE" steal of the draft. Even if he doesn't earn RB2 right away. Also, this takes nothing away from Josh Jacobs :)

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:38 am

From reading about these guys picked I would bet this class will offer to this team more what most of us expect.

+ REPLY
4 points
6
2
dobber's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:32 am

I agree. Part of that is picking guys who have a clearly-defined path to snaps on game day, and part of that is picking guys at positions of very questionable depth.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:00 am

"Nineteen" new faces, Al?
I think you forgot a couple big ones... (hint: a RB and a S).
:-D

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:10 am

The Packers drafted 11 players and signed 8 UDFAs. That equals 19 players. There are a few more who are coming in to rookie minicamp as tryout players though.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:40 am

We have 3 kickers and I think one or two now surplus ST types. In the past Gute has snagged players released post mini camps too.

I’d be surprised if we don’t have 2 punters through the summer just for practical reasons, but there’s still other change to come.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
calabasa's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:45 am

He’s talking about McKinney and Jacob’s- they count as “fresh faces” although not draft picks.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:21 am

And the reclamation project, former #1 pick Dillard.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:08 pm

Ahhhh yeah forgot about them...lol

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:06 am

PEO was referring to Xavier McKinney and Josh Jacobs, both of whom are new faces.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Untylu1968's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:14 am

How high were the hopes and expectations for Bahk to become a great tackle when we drafted him? I get that one was a 1st and one a 4th, but all measurables, with the exception of shorter arms by an inch, are comparable. I predict that at some point, he takes over left tackle and excels. This draft may take a couple of years, but it'll prove to be a very good one!

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
dobber's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:38 am

"How high were the hopes and expectations for Bahk to become a great tackle when we drafted him?"

The initial draft scout on Bakh was that he was destined to be a G.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Untylu1968's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:59 am

Exactly!🍻

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:24 am

And Tom was pigeon holed at C and quickly flew the coop to land at T.

I know many were feeling Tom was too small hold up at T. But his feet, balance and leverage overcame his size and arm worries. Morgan is another dancer on the edge.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:06 pm

“Baktiari is a tough, physical type of guy that will bring some nastiness to the Packers Offensive Line. Despite being a self-professed “gym rat,” he needs to get stronger in the upper body (arms and shoulders). I thought he would have been better off staying at Coloroda for another year. He is a possible conversion to guard or even center, but I think he’ll be given a full shot to win the left tackle job. I’m a bit unsure about him in pass protection on the edge, but I’ll go out on a (short) limb and say he’s a better run blocker than Marshall Newhouse right now…”

Jersey Al Bracco

https://allgbp.com/2013/04/27/packers-2013-nfl-draft-fourth-round-pick-d...

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Oppy's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:41 pm

Bahktiari was a guy I completely underrated. Even after his first season or two, I didn't think he was anything special.

Boy, was I wrong about him in the best way possible.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
beerandbrats's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:33 am

That first pick almost made me lose my mind because I didn't know we had an OT problem! I was hoping we would trade down for more picks with a focus on the best linebackers and safeties.

Good thing I'm not in charge of the draft because I forgot that we needed to replace Yosh Nijman at swing tackle! Morgan provides us with both depth and starting potential. I'm thinking he will most likely compete with Walker, Tom and Rhyan for a starting spot. We should see some OL musical chairs in training camp as we sort these guys out but our OL depth and flexibility are looking much better after this draft. Nicely done Gute!

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
GregC's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:28 am

I also thought they already had their starters at OT, so they did not need to draft one so early. But apparently that's where the value was. I felt great about the Jordan Morgan pick once they had drafted arguably the best linebacker and best safety in round 2. That was the trifecta, although I would've been happy if the offensive lineman was just a guard. The fact that Morgan is a tackle who can potentially play guard is so much the better.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
Tundraboy's picture

May 03, 2024 at 03:35 pm

Exactly. Nothing to be disappointed about this year, really. Let's see how this young team develops. Another Spring that is already light years ahead of the dog days.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:30 am

This is going to go down as Gute's best draft yet.

+ REPLY
3 points
5
2
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:10 am

I'll take that bet it isn't-
Like Savage- and the Amos regression.
I can add a few more that he signed.
You fail to see Gute will always make mistakes.
Gute's advantage is the weak Division.

+ REPLY
-5 points
2
7
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:15 pm

So you think the safety room is going to be worse this year than last year? Wow that would be really bad free agent signings and drafting.

We know that Gute makes mistakes, EVERYONE makes mistakes. We also know that Gute will do his best to fix the biggest issues on the team the next year. We saw that LB and safety were an issue in 2023 so Gute went and drafted multiple players at LB and safety in 2024 AND signed the top FA safety. The use of multiple picks at a position increases the odds that one of them will be good.

Right now the NFC North is looking like it will be very competitive in over the next few years. However, that requires the Bears to not kill Williams and McCarthy to be good.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:00 pm

The use of multiple picks at a position increases the odds that one of them will be good.
Now that is Bottom feeder statement if I ever heard one.
The two heads are better than one?.
Seems your thinking with the wrong head.

+ REPLY
-2 points
2
4
Coldworld's picture

May 02, 2024 at 08:07 am

Just yet more confirmation that your conception of probability and the historical success rates of draft picks is completely flawed.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
stockholder's picture

May 02, 2024 at 06:13 pm

You know what -
I'm not the one with the 3rd curse.
And this is the part where Gute blew it-
1. Hicks was available.
How many Loved him more?
Williams isn't a physical specimen.
And he could have move Bullard.
Trading up was a waste.
And I'll bet Wright turns into the All
Rookie RB.
He even had a shot at Tampa
When this draft is graded 3 yrs from now.
Your Gute will have to redraft back-ups.

+ REPLY
-1 points
1
2
Oppy's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:45 pm

...and you fail to see that all GM's will always make mistakes.
About 50% of the time, most figure.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 02, 2024 at 10:58 am

Why is it a weak division? Doesn't the North usually send two teams to the playoffs every year?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:30 am

The draft really didn't surprise me. We got players in positions of need first which always seems prudent.

I think we're going to be ok on defense with these picks but let's give Hafley the first half season to see what he's got, what actually works and their depth when injuries start.

My real concern is the OL. Are we really in trouble/doubt with Walker at LT? Yes, he's no Bakh but he looked very good the second half of last season. I get it that u can never have enough tackles but we are getting a really sizable collection here now? I have always liked the idea of versatility in OLinemen. Never being a fan of either Myers or Newman as starters, I sure hope that we can move players around to get our truly "best 5 olinemen" in place sooner than later...

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:11 am

The best 5 should be properly evaluated by TC at the latest, with preseason games giving them a chance to gel, so they're READY week 1.

IMHO coaches failing to do this has been the team's biggest weakness for at least 2 years. Hopefully they improve, and specifically at this skill. I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise, but this is THE single biggest variable re: getting to the SB this season, or not.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 01, 2024 at 06:15 pm

Were we in trouble with Walker on the blind side last year? Not in the second half of the season. Far from it in fact. Over the whole season, Walker graded out pretty well despite his early struggles.

We had two problems. We lost our swing tackle and we had no other depth at all beyond perhaps Caleb Jones and Tenuta even if we kept Tom and Walker where they are, an injury and we were one step away from Newman, less on game days. If Tom moved we were there anyway. Similar situation at G with Runyon gone.

Now we have depth and alternatives for Tom and even Jenkins. That matters if we want to compete. Let them be tested and the best overall 5 men win.

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
murf7777's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:41 am

Good analysis. Regarding Monk, I think he will be a starting Center within two years. I’m excited about that pick. Put 10 lbs onto Cooper and you might be seeing a future pro-bowler. I just love his aggressiveness. Now, he will get caught running by some plays Ala Quay at times, but he will make up for it with many tackles behind the LOS. He had huge college production last year. Morgan, if coached up will become a long term starter for the Packers. Overall, I love the 1st four picks. The sleeper pick might be another 7th rounder with King.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:12 am

And Pratt.

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
murf7777's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:57 am

This team is set up to be stellar at defending the pass and keeping running QB’s in check. One thing that concerns me is can these players hold up vs a team that likes to ground and pound. Time will tell, but I know this D is going to be exciting to watch.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:27 am

I think the switch from a 2 gap scheme to a 1 gap scheme will help shore up the running D. Not to mention that Williams and Oladapo graded out as elite run defenders in college.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
BruceC1960's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:10 am

Hope Monk is this years Zac Tom.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:50 am

I would also enjoy Morgan becoming another Tom at Tackle!

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:42 am

Fun Fact. In the last 3 drafts the Packers have taken 35 players. Out of those 35 players, 33 are still on the team. (obviously I'm including this years draft).
But the amount of players Gutey has brought in these last 3 drafts, is incredible. And its not just bodies that he has brought in. Key contributors. He has transformed this roster. He has drafted 14 starting caliber players in the last 2 drafts. The track record is good.
For UDFA's there will be one that will make the 53. The easy pick is Jennings. They gave him a big salary. But the one that I think could have the biggest impact and could win the job is Peter Bowden. He has been the Badgers long snapper for everything the last 2 years. In 2022 he was a semifinalist for the Patrick Mannelly Award (the best college long snapper). In 2023 he was a finalist for it. Many people had issues with Carlson. But if you look at a lot of the misses, there were a lot of bad snaps. LS to me is a big need.

Favorite Draft pick -
For me I have a really hard time picking just 1. For me the first 4 picks all made a ton of sense.
I rewatched the senior bowl and focused on Morgan. I think he is the future LT. Definitely needs some fundamental work, but I think he with our OL coaches I believe he get to where he needs to. While watching the senior bowl there was a mock draft that scrolled through. Morgan was projected to go at 27.

Cooper I think gives us that electric LB that instantly gives us one of the best duo's in the league.

Bullard I think gives us the player we hoped we were getting with Savage.

Lloyd gives us that electric RB that will give us the ultimate balance to our offense. His ability as a runner and receiver will really open the offense up I believe.

Least Favorite Pick - For the record I don't hate any of the picks.
But the one that I'm kind of curious about is Hopper. Since the Senior Bowl a player that I liked was Cedric Gray. I would have preferred him over Hopper, but I am hoping Hopper is the better pick.

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
calabasa's picture

May 01, 2024 at 10:51 am

“PINING FOR THE FJORDS?!”

Thank you for that. One of my all-time favorites that I’m sure most don’t know about…

https://youtu.be/vZw35VUBdzo?si=6tDSeFs6jj1bQSxx

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
splitpea1's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:13 am

Many people have the same feeling about Morgan; the pick isn't terribly exciting, but I can understand the rationale with all the other tackles off the board. I'll just have to trust Gute here.

Bullard seems to be the most solid pick, with no reaching or trading required to get him. Best values: Pratt and King. I'm still very surprised they didn't address CB a little earlier.

I'm not going to say they're my least favorites, but the LBs are definitely a wait-and-see proposition. I know they've got great potential, but I want to see them turn into rock-soild tacklers in addition to making the highlight plays. They should be able to contribute on special teams as well. Quay and McDuffie are now the elder statesmen and will now assume some leadership responsibilities.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:09 pm

Morgan is more than an OT, he can play 4 positions. I'm assuming that means everything but C. Keeping him as depth this season and able to substitute anyone injured could be a huge upgrade, as well as possibly needing to dress fewer O linemen freeing up at least one roster spot. That scenario means we have at least five better than him, which would be a good thing. If he beats somebody for their position outright, that would also be a good thing.

I can't find a downside to this pick.

As you say about our rookie LBs, every draft pick is a wait and see proposition. I'm not sure if I'll be able to get to any practices during TC this summer, but it will be at least as pivotal as last year. Hopefully it will prove to be momentous in Packer's history, at least making it TO the SB ...

GPG!!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:42 am

The drafting of Travis Glover signals that the Packers are likely to move on from one, or more of, Caleb Jones, Luke Tenuta and Kadeem Telfort this training camp. Now adding Glover to this developmental group. Simply, it's Gutekunst panning for gold nuggets with late round and UDFA capital. A low investment yet potentially high reward strategy.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
GregC's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:58 pm

If Glover is moved to guard, which seems quite possible, let's hope he can at least beat out Royce Newman.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 01, 2024 at 01:19 pm

I think that Glover will need at least 1 year to work on his technical deficiencies. So Monk and even Morgan may be earlier replacements for Newman - whom Gutekunst may not want to pay his 3M salary this year.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
GregC's picture

May 01, 2024 at 01:50 pm

Hmmmm, they do have a couple of undrafted rookies coming in who can play guard, but they will probably need some time to develop too. That $3 million salary will be hard to justify for Newman though, unless he plays a lot better.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:12 pm

AP, I think that's a premature prediction right now. Does anybody in the FO think this? Hopefully they all want legitimate competition, and excel at evaluating.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:48 am

This will be one of the most anticipated TC's for me in many years: OL, Run Game with Jacobs, Pass Game with so many exciting young prospects; and the New Look Defense with McKinney, Alexander, Clark and the Kids.

Plenty of material for upcoming "Confessions from a Polluted Mindset" by Jersey Al.

By the way, congrats again nailing the Morgan pick, Al!

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 01, 2024 at 11:58 am

'''''Someone that will make receivers take their eye off the ball as they prepare to be leveled. Bullard is that guy'''''

You are old, Al. You can't level a 'defenseless' receiver anymore. It's a penalty.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:41 pm

You can still separate the player from the ball you just have to be really sure you don't hit them in the head.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 01, 2024 at 02:58 pm

Helmet hits are easy to call and justify, but I've seen flags for a hard shoulder to the ribs of a receiver who wasn't paying attention. That "defenseless" stuff gives the ref an option, and if a receiver gets crumpled from a hard hit, he can and will throw flags.

Any hit that seems unnecessarily violent is subject to penalty.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 03:27 pm

I'd still take the 15 yards for a hard hit dislodging the ball, especially if the completion was going to be more than 15 yards, any day. Guaranteed the next time that WR goes over the middle he is going to hear footsteps and could have a concentration drop.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:14 pm

"Some people just need to get whacked" - Campanile, probably

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:04 pm

Part 2 - My reply to Gute's support-

You see Flexibility-
I see Risk.
Everything is always changing.
This team has been in a
Constant state of flux,
where change is inevitable.
It's Gute's essential part of existence.
Yet- You cannot see the Gaines of our opponents.
Gute created holes.
And filled those holes with the unknown.
You sight team Loyalty first.
Say I don't know what I'm talking about.
Yet who was calling for cleaning the House.
You know it starts at the Top.
Team Loyalty never survives losing.
And I was never a rat that abandoned ship.

+ REPLY
-8 points
2
10
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 12:34 pm

"You see Flexibility-
I see Risk."

Flexibility allows you to get the best players on the field. EVERY lineup in the NFL has risks.

"Everything is always changing.
This team has been in a
Constant state of flux,
where change is inevitable.
It's Gute's essential part of existence."

Staying stagnant in the NFL is the best way to be average or worse. You need to keep changing your roster by the year in an attempt to get better. Remember how many people thought that Tampa Bay was going to win the Super Bowl again in the 2021 season since they had such little roster turnover? Instead they lost in the divisional round. 2022 they brought out mostly the same roster AGAIN and did even worse. You need to change to get better. If you keep things the same you are only getting worse year over year.

"Yet- You cannot see the Gaines of our opponents."

We totally see that other teams have gotten better, at least on paper. However, you cannot see that the Packers have also gotten better, at least on paper.

"Gute created holes.
And filled those holes with the unknown."

What holes did he create? Safety? LB? Safety play was already bottom 5 in the NFL last year so it cannot be any worse this year. However, it will most likely be even better just because of McKinney. The LBs weren't doing very well last year either. De'Vondre Campbell hasn't been as good since his 2021 All-Pro season. He was injured in 2022 & 2023 and you could see he has lost at least 1 if not 2 steps. In 2023 he had a 65.4 PFF grade which is average. Cooper can probably be no worse than Campbell last year AND he should keep getting better.

"You sight team Loyalty first.
Say I don't know what I'm talking about."

It is quite apparent you don't know what you are talking about. If somehow you were the GM the Packers would get worse year over year and eventually be the continual worst team in the league.

"Yet who was calling for cleaning the House.
You know it starts at the Top."

Some people, like you, have said Gute should be fired since he drafted Jordan Love. What you fail to realize is that Love was a good pick. However, you cannot accept that as you were a fan of Rodgers and hate that he is no longer on the team. What most of us wanted was for the defensive staff to be jettisoned. We saw the same issues on the D coming around year after year. Last year over the final few games the D did better because LaFluer was getting involved in the D. For 23 of the 30 minutes the D was on the field they were playing amazingly. However, the final drive by the 49ers we saw Barry revert to his norm and give up what they did well before that. Things like that is why Barry had to go.

"Team Loyalty never survives losing.
And I was never a rat that abandoned ship."

Strange you seem to have abandoned ship as soon as Love was named the starter. You do nothing but bash Gute, LaFluer, Love, and anyone else that you think caused you harm as the reason your favorite player left the team. Go be a Jets fan since you seem to like players instead of teams.

+ REPLY
5 points
7
2
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 01:49 pm

I see a team that you gave up on.
I said don't tank after the Douglass trade.
That team made the playoffs.
Get off it.
Now its about bringing the team back!

+ REPLY
-7 points
2
9
DoubleJ's picture

May 01, 2024 at 02:43 pm

You have done nothing but give up on the team since Rodgers got traded. Everything they do you are complaining about even when it is a good signing. You literally are a person who is a fan of individual players on a team but not the team itself. You loved Rodgers and as soon as bad news about his relationship with the Packers came out you were trashing Gute and praising Rodgers. As I've said go over to the Jets already since they have your favorite player.

I personally never gave up on the team. I liked the Douglas trade AND knew that Love needed time with a very young team. I am not some fair weather fan or a fan of a team because of a singular player.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 05:05 pm

No - You personally Love Gute!
Don't bring up Rodgers Now.
This has nothing to do with Rodgers,
Love , or any guy that had left with Rodgers.

The team made the play-offs, and was Gutted.
You now have 3 positions that will depend on Rookies.
You now have two veterans that must perform
better than Savage and Jones.
And if they get injured.
More Rookies will be exposed.

Gute lost Leadership.
Bahk- Jones, and Campbell.
All who had injuries and wanted
to comeback.
And look what Douglass did for the Bills.
You're in error. About everything.

+ REPLY
-5 points
2
7
Oppy's picture

May 01, 2024 at 07:49 pm

You are so full of shit I can't even begin.

You get ZERO right to claim you've steadfastly backed this team as a competitor.

You've stated, flat out, that as long as Love is the QB, this team won't be a winner.

You are such a fraud.

+ REPLY
1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

May 01, 2024 at 08:51 pm

How did that get into this?
Try this one instead-
As long as Gute is the GM
The packers won't win a super-bowl.

+ REPLY
-2 points
2
4
Oppy's picture

May 01, 2024 at 09:52 pm

Fraud.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Packman60's picture

May 02, 2024 at 07:18 pm

Does someone crap in your cheerios every morning? This was a team expected to finish under .500 LY with a brand new QB and the youngest team in the league. They fast forwarded their re-build by at least a year or two over what might've been expected making the playoffs and knocking off the heavily favored Cowboys in their home stadium. This draft was about fortifying the roster, adding depth and filling in the few holes that remained. Gutey has done a masterful job in the past two drafts and I believe this one will make it three. It's hard to say whether they'll win a Super Bowl in the next couple of years as everything has to fall right once you're in the playoffs, but we are certainly positioned to contend for one based upon the job he's done.
In Gutey we Trust !!!!

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 02, 2024 at 08:14 am

To be fair he stated the same of his predecessor.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
stockholder's picture

May 02, 2024 at 05:31 pm

I think ahead of the changes.
Being prepared can reduce the punishment.
Gute won't think outside the box.
If you don't see the Risk.
You can always cry for MLF head again.

+ REPLY
-3 points
1
4
Turophile's picture

May 02, 2024 at 03:41 am

The first 4 picks (Morgan, Cooper, Bullard, Lloyd) could all easily advance to being starters in the NFL and at this time I think they all will. This is irrespective of the later picks (and I bet some of THEM will surprise). Now it is up to the players themselves and the coaches, to make each of them the best version of themselves that they can be.

I am somewhere between hoping and expecting this draft to be as good as 2022 and 2023. If it is, watch out.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 02, 2024 at 12:41 pm

Thanks Al for sharing your thoughts on draft picks. It is always interesting to read opinion of someone who spent much more time than any of us with draft prospects (assembling CHTV Draft Guide).

I feel OK with the this Packers draft since I heard or read a dozen reviews from several sources. What is common from those reviews is that Packers drafted aggressive players for the defense and/or ST. And that is what I like. Attacking opponents is the best defense contra them (something that Barry rarely used - except for Dallas game! And, as I understood DC Hafley, that is how he sees his defense - the reason why I liked him from the beginning of his presentation to the public.

When you look at the tapes of the selected players, you can see obvious aggression and violent type of playing. Sometimes they made mistakes, but much more they get the job done. Also, I was watching some statements from coach Hafley previous players, that confirms me how he is not affraid of mistakes his player may do here or there, occasionaly, butg he supports their instincts and wants them to play reflexively. That is the fastest way of doing things.

But, as we all knows, speed of playing in NFL is quite faster than in the college and the question is just how much time each of those players will need to adapt themselves to that higher speed of the game.

I am cautiously optimistic - GPG!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.