Can McCarthy Resist The Urge To Go Back To Play Calling?

The glowing reviews are already coming in for McCarthy's big switch. Can the coach keep his hands off the play call sheet? 

Tom Oates of the Wisconsin State Journal has a great column about Mike McCarthy giving up play calling and how the team is already seeing a return on that particular investment. 

Money quotes: 

McCarthy, who spent most of his time on offense during his first nine seasons as coach, decided after last season to delegate some of his offensive duties so he could devote more time to the defense and special teams. That’s been the case during offseason meetings and workouts, and no less an authority than Rodgers insists the defensive and special teams coaches enjoy having the big boss around after years of relative autonomy.

McCarthy’s not so sure those coaches are as happy as they’re letting on.

“I think openly they’d say yes,” he said Saturday at the American Family Children’s Hospital in Madison. “I think privately they’d probably say no.”

On the football field, McCarthy’s area of interest has always been offense. In his new role, which included handing off the play-calling duties to assistant head coach Tom Clements, he hopes to make an impact elsewhere on the team by bringing an offensive perspective into the defensive meeting room, by increasing the emphasis put on the beleaguered special teams and by being more aware of big-picture trends on game day.

McCarthy’s input has already had an impact on the defense and special teams during three weeks of OTA practices, though he was quick to point out that the moves were in no way a repudiation of longtime defensive coordinator Dom Capers or first-year special teams coordinator Ron Zook. Indeed, McCarthy said the Packers clearly have the best coaching staff in football.

(Make sure you read the whole thing. It's truly exceptional work from Tom, who does a masterful job of weaving both the reason McCarthy was available to speak, the benefit for the children's hospital, with some solid football information. Having been tasked with this kind of thing before, I can tell you it's not nearly as easy as Tom makes it seem here.)  

When McCarthy officially handed off the play calling duties to Tom Clements, I felt it was an overreaction to the loss in Seattle. I still think that, but McCarthy has done a good job of saying all the right things about having been leaning this way for the last few years. Who am I to doubt him?

I will say, I will be absolutely shocked if McCarthy doesn't take the reins back at some point this year. The guy is a play caller. It's in his blood, the same way it was in Holmgren's blood. 

For now, it's nice to read and hear about the positive aspects of the move early on in the offseason. But when push comes to shove and the offense goes through a rough patch, which always happens, will McCarthy be able to remain hands-off when it comes to the big, laminated play call sheet? 

We'll see. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (9)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Idiot Fan's picture

June 15, 2015 at 01:58 pm

This is a small example of why I'm a big fan of stability in coaching staffs rather than the "fire everybody when there's a down year" approach. McCarthy could never have done this if there wasn't a huge amount of stability on the offensive side, both from a player and coaching standpoint.

My goodness this season cannot come fast enough.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

June 15, 2015 at 03:29 pm

I think McCarthy stepping aside from play calling might actually allow him to see things more clearly on offense.

He might now catch some tendencies of defenses or he might see better ways to attack the defense with various formations and/or play calls. Also he might catch on more when the offense gets into a rut and be able to fix it quicker.

With his eyes on the field more and less at his play sheet he might be able to help the offense out more.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

June 15, 2015 at 04:23 pm

I simply agree with you. He was not feeling the pulse of his team. He was preparing play calls while there was playing ST or D. In the NFL Championship game he did not noticed that Clay was out, completely exhausted, he did not notice that after Morgan intercepted Wilson, complete team - his team - just stop playing seriously. They thought the game is over. Mike McCarthy was wondering what happened? Because he did not feel the team at the crucial moments... He was buried into his playbook... He re watched the game more than once I'm sure. And he noticed how play calling duty was distracted him from winning that game...

0 points
0
0
Ferrari Driveer's picture

June 15, 2015 at 05:32 pm

I believe McCarthy has grown as a head coach. Much of the play calling is "done" during the game plan development.

I always felt the Packers were not alert and efficient during the game regarding play challenges and special teams. I look for improvement in both this year and expect to see some of that improvement because of the head coach.

I believe the change will be permanent.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

June 15, 2015 at 11:18 pm

I agree that much of the playcalling is "done" during game plan development, and I think MM will be very involved in that phase each week.
I also think that MM will have a much better opportunity to see the "big picture" during each game by relinquishing the playcalling duties.

0 points
0
0
Clay Zombo's picture

June 15, 2015 at 08:18 pm

Im not sure if MM didnt know Richard Sherman was hurt in the closing minutes of that NFCCG or what the case was but I just hope hes more free to see these kinds of things and then instructs the play caller to call plays to that side of the field. I would have loved to see Sherman try and tackle Lacy or Starks with 1 arm.

I do think MM can resist the urge to take back the call sheet during the game but I also like that possibility of a change up should the offense have trouble moving the ball at any point.

0 points
0
0
Mojo's picture

June 15, 2015 at 11:34 pm

Forgot all about the Sherman thing. MM and the Pack should have been all Richard Kimball on him but gave him a pass. Yet another of the numerous mental blunders from the game that must not be spoken.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

June 16, 2015 at 02:11 am

I don't remember if MM said whether he was aware of Sherman's injury. I remember MM being quoted as saying he wasn't aware that CM3 was out for a time in the 4th quarter. I did find an article that quotes Jordy Nelson saying that he (Nelson) did not know Sherman was injured. I guess that surprises me. Here is the link to that article:
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/injury-left-seahawks-richard-sher...

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

June 16, 2015 at 10:01 am

With cameras rolling and Sherman being a huge part of the picture,I find it hard to believe that denying any knowledge or belief Sherman was injured is ridiculous,just by the number of times it was mentioned via the announcers and showings of Sherman on the stadiums big screen,a thing looked up on so often by the players it's a wonder their aren't more neck injuries via 'rubber necking',much less the fact that a communication of some sort on the field could have been sent to Rodgers via the WR being face to face with Sherman at the LOS during four offensive series.Either the Packers believed him to be buffing or they were again revisiting the week 1 plan of stay away.Both options if either true, were a disgrace for an offense so heralded.

Face your fears....failed.

Exploit your opponents weakness and let him not regain his confidence...failed.

Fear not the trampling of the dead for there may be life among them that will rise to take yours.....failed.

0 points
0
0