Comments on: Brohm Still Struggling

By: MC

MC — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:15:46 +0000

Aaron, FYI: I may use pugilistic or lugubrious before the day is over.

By: packeraaron

packeraaron — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:23:16 +0000

I love that someone who reads our site used the word ‘nihilism’, and did so without quoting Lebowski. You don’t get THAT at the ol’ GBPG!

By: Sparkyo

Sparkyo — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:36:53 +0000

Aaron, you’re right that AR never looked as bad as Brohm did last year, but that’s not saying a whole lot! Still, I am in agreement with what MC has said about AR, circa 2005-6. I would describe 2005-6 as having plenty of deer in the headlights moments for Rodgers. Indeed, 2007 was no picnic either in my memory of his play with a couple of exceptions that you’ve already enumerated. I also remember being at Packers’ Family Night in 2008 and seeing him get booed by some fans for his poor play at the outset. BTW, I’m sure at least a measure of that was fallout from the Favre imbroglio. I also don’t want you to think that I am painting you as necessarily jumping the gun in a rush to judgment on Brohm as I know you are generally a thoughtful observer of all things football. Bottom line, to sum up my general outlook, I guess I just have a problem with all the nihilism seen in the comments sections on these Packer sites regarding anything unassociated with BLF’s posterior.

By: Ron La Canne

Ron La Canne — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:50:21 +0000

Still not sure why they picked a QB at #2 last year. Basically, it was a “crap shoot”. What the Packers needed was a backup for Rogers not a developmental project. Actually they got their developmental project with Flynn at #7. If they’re not planning on Rodgers for 6 or 7 more years I’m really confused. I’ll guarentee that Brohm will not be with Packers after his rookie contract expires. If the Packers are lucky they could pick up a #5 or 6 for him. Most likely he’ll be cut.

By: bomdad

bomdad — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:12:17 +0000

CTpack up in the valley!

By: retiredgrampa

retiredgrampa — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:10:46 +0000

AS packer fans, we can feel some concern because we expect more from a QB picked that high. However, we may have struck some kind of gold (maybe not 24 kt) with Flynn. Let’s count our blessings. What if TT HADN’T taken Flynn too? We’re not going to bat 100%, that’s for sure. Never forget those famous words….”CRAP SHOOT!”

By: ctpack

ctpack — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:59:38 +0000

I make Ct look bad, What? I represent the Pack all over the 203 and the 860.I watch games at Buffalo Wilds Wings in Milford with few Packer fans.We could of had the Michigan quaterback the Dolphins took after Brohm.

By: Jayme

Jayme — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:10:29 +0000

Aaron – not only did he start all 16 games, but he played hurt. So he showed that he was a tough player, but failed to dispel the “injury prone” label that’s followed him.

By: packeraaron

packeraaron — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:00:59 +0000

MC – he didn’t look like a Pro Bowler, but there was definite improvement. And after the Pittsburgh preseason game, the Dallas performance didn’t surprise me in the least. What DID surprise me was Rodgers starting all 16 games last season. Never thought that would happen.

By: MC

MC — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:52:54 +0000

My memory’s getting hazy, but I seem to recall A-Rodge looking pretty awful in 2005 and 2006. And I remember being fairly shocked at how well he played while subbing for Favre vs. the Cowboys in ‘07. Brohm still has a decent shot to become a good player.

By: PackersRS

PackersRS — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:51:55 +0000

There’s a chineese proverb that goes kind of like this: If a horse wins one race, it’s luck. If he wins two races, it’s coincidence. If he wins three races, bet on that horse. I feel that way with Brohm. I hoped this time he would beat Flynn (who, btw, is a winner. Am I the only one seeing Hasselback writen all over him?), but it’s okay IMO if he doesn’t. But he better win the 2nd string job by september 2010, or he’s a bust.

By: ctpack

ctpack — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:53:58 +0000

Mark,all I am saying is Rodgers( I feel) has much better upside than Brohm.Packers have the youngest team in the league.Only time will tell for all these young players we have

By: packeraaron

packeraaron — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:22:54 +0000

Sparkyo, it’s a fair point you’re making but to be clear, Rodgers never looked as bad as Brohm did last preseason. Did he struggle? Sure. But he never had the deer-in-the-headlights look that Brohm does when he’s under center. Plus, Rodgers took command of the huddle from the moment he was drafted. I distinctly remember him jumping all over an OL in his first preseason drive his rookie year when the lineman had a false-start. Some saw that as Rodgers being cocky (Corey hated Rodgers for this and other signs of arrogance for years) but I saw it as a kid who was drafted behind a legend and wanted to assert himself as soon as possible.
-
I don’t have any problems with where Brohm is. Again, I’m concerned, but no more than I would be with any other second year struggling player. But you def saw a jump in Rodgers play from year one to year two. No, he wasn’t Mr. August the way Hasselbeck was, but he def improved in Year Two. Here’s hoping we see the same improvement from Brohm.

By: Sparkyo

Sparkyo — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:10:45 +0000

Hold on folks! I seem to remember very similar questions being asked about Aaron Rodgers’ play in his second preseason. It seems to me that there is a lot more to playing QB in the NFL than merely learning the plays. You have to decide who you are going to be as a player and you have to become a man under the most unforgiving spotlight. Brohm never really had to think about those issues in the bubble that was Louisville as his brother was his coach and he was a lot closer to his family. In Green Bay he’s on his own and that crucible will either make or break him. I want to see what he does throughout this year and next year as well, if he manages to hold on. You guys are way jumping the gun on this one, just as you did with AR, whom I think was more emotionally mature than Brohm is at this stage of his career. Everyone matures at a different rate and that’s neither good nor bad, just different. I say bravo to Flynn for the strides he’s made thus far, but I’m also not giving up on Brohm quite yet.

By: Jayme

Jayme — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:05:18 +0000

LOL, I was thinking the exact same thing. I think I’ve deciphered it to read: “If we had kept Favre around another year, Rodgers wouldn’t have re-signed, we may not have drafted Flynn, and Brohm would be our #1 QB right now.”

It is an interesting, and scary, thought, but altogether unlikely. If Favre comes back before the draft, or doesn’t decide that he’s leaving in the first place, Rodgers sticks around another year. If he decided to come back after the draft, and the Packers had accepted him, we’d already have Flynn, who’s outperforming Brohm. While it’s possible that someone else would pick up Flynn after he was put on wavers in order to be placed on the practice squad, I don’t see it as being all that likely.

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:58:03 +0000

@ctpack – stop making CT packers fans look ignorant!

I’m concerned too about Brohm. He was a 2nd round pick, and is having trouble catching on as a 3rd string QB. Didn’t he go through McCarthy’s QB School that helped A-Rod so much? It’s amazing how much Brohm’s stock has dropped since he decided to return for his senior year.

By: PackerAaron

PackerAaron — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:32:52 +0000

What language is that?

By: ctpack

ctpack — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:03:49 +0000

If the Packers kept 4# then eventually may have have only Brohm